Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBR Strategic Business Reporting Forums › *** ACCA P2 December 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***
- This topic has 100 replies, 39 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by david1988.
- AuthorPosts
- December 6, 2016 at 8:51 pm #354752
Too bad P2 was cancelled in my city as my state’s chief minister passed away π Anyway, I hope to get the refund soon!!
December 6, 2016 at 9:15 pm #354763Why a lot of people didnβt answer Q4, there was 18 free mak in part A & B(ii)
Part A was from technical articles
Please tell the name of technical articles if you can.
Thanks
December 6, 2016 at 9:19 pm #354764@almoosawi4 said:
Why a lot of people didn’t answer Q4, there was 18 free mak in part A & B(ii)Part A was from technical articles
Please tell the name of article if you can.
Thanks
December 6, 2016 at 9:33 pm #354770What did people put for 1b and 1c?
December 6, 2016 at 9:44 pm #354776@mynameisearl said:
What did people put for 1b and 1c?Just talked about the different kind of costs for pensions. Service costs, actuarial gains and losses , interest etc and where they were posted.
1 (c) I focused mostly on the ACCA code of ethics and how they were breached by attempting to make the bonus targets. Competence, integrity and behaviour were main 3.
What about you?
December 6, 2016 at 10:14 pm #354781AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- β
@kelvinlengg said:
Does anyone remember the standards apply for Question 3(c)?
Was it the criteria for development cost to be capitalized under ias38??I thought 3c was about how value in use should be calculated.
December 6, 2016 at 10:18 pm #354782AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- β
@mynameisearl said:
Hi,Will the answers be available on this website? If so when?
Q1 I had a profit on disposal which I included in my p&l.
The fv adjustment I left the good will as it was originally (dont know if that was right) I added the fv depreciation to cost of sales.
I was really unsure of the both investment properties. I reversed out the 3m provision.
The pension seemed OK I thought the remeasurement was a gain.
Sales I was a bit unsure of treatment. I didn’t discount I took off the credit note and added the extra 7000 units at Β£1000.im sure I will find out that was wrong tho.
I didn’t discount either as additional 5000 has not been purchased.
December 6, 2016 at 10:24 pm #354785AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- β
@mynameisearl said:
Thank you that’s how I read it. But don’t think I did the credit note correctly as I times by 6000 and deducted from revenueI deducted credit note as well from the revenue. It doesn’t matter when they agreed to settle it, what matters is that revenue for 6000 units that was initially recognized, now is lower due to defects hence credit note should be taken into consideration. This is my view.
December 6, 2016 at 11:17 pm #354791I deducted the credit notes from revenue. 6,000 x $40 = $0.24M.
The 13,000 units wasn’t enough for a discount, so 13,000 x $1,000 is recognised in total, which is $13M.
December 7, 2016 at 2:06 am #354802@vebem said:
Please tell the name of article if you can.Thanks
“Impairment of financial assets”
December 7, 2016 at 4:39 am #354812Just quick question, Q1 (b) it was asking about P&L vs OCI and recycling process. Or it was about types of pensions?
December 7, 2016 at 4:58 am #354813I didn’t consolidate the results of subsidiary that was disposed..only gain and income from associate
how much will be effect on marking?December 7, 2016 at 5:23 am #354821@seanog91 said:
Correct me if I am wrong and I do not want to panic you but see below :The functional currency for Minor was Euro as they sold to the competitive market in Euro. this is the main criteria of 21. they only bought goods in dollars from the parent but converted to euro in Portugal.
Also, ther was no Active market in the scenario so we can not use level1. We have to use Level 2 as they were all listed companies. The definition they had for an inactive market was wrong as well.
I agree to you. The functional currency for minor was euro. one of the reason was that too that its local govt determine the price for the products imported from its parent.
December 7, 2016 at 5:38 am #354829was the question about gains on losses on pension schemes as in defined contribution plan or defined benefit scheme? I think i messed that one up big time cause i thought it said the increase was in the ‘final’ salary? so treated the whole thing as actuarial gains and losses and so should be on OCI not PL.
aw i’m screwedDecember 7, 2016 at 6:19 am #354838P2 was OK, I could answer every question, rushed to get at least a written page or more on each of question 2. a, b and c as well as 3. a, b and c.
Question 1 was so-so, the disposal calculation was a bit of a fail and didn’t know much to much about 1. b but wrote a lot of stuff in the hope of a mark or two.
I am hoping for a pass, I really put a lot of time into preparation for the exam.
December 7, 2016 at 6:20 am #354839@almoosawi4 said:
Just quick question, Q1 (b) it was asking about P&L vs OCI and recycling process. Or it was about types of pensions?I know 1C) was about the pension scheme and how the directors were worried about increase from 10-15 and how they planned to use creative accounting to have the pension costs go through oci which would increase operating profit and this is what their bonus was on, basically think you had to say the scenario and then talk about it being unethical ect.
1)b) I literally had no idea what this wanted, something about different Ifrs for small entities. 0/8 for me
December 7, 2016 at 6:25 am #354840@kevikraze said:
I know 1C) was about the pension scheme and how the directors were worried about increase from 10-15 and how they planned to use creative accounting to have the pension costs go through oci which would increase operating profit and this is what their bonus was on, basically think you had to say the scenario and then talk about it being unethical ect.1)b) I literally had no idea what this wanted, something about different Ifrs for small entities. 0/8 for me
I didn’t know much about it either… I assumed to explain items such as service costs that are SPL items and actuarial re-measurement that was a OCI item. Then stated that it will be OCI and not reclassified to PL because the entity will never benefit from it as the financial gain or loss will stay in the pension fund but it increases the value of the business hence we recognise it… but I don’t know if that’s correct. I hope the marker thinks it is.
December 7, 2016 at 7:04 am #354870@kevikraze said:
I know 1C) was about the pension scheme and how the directors were worried about increase from 10-15 and how they planned to use creative accounting to have the pension costs go through oci which would increase operating profit and this is what their bonus was on, basically think you had to say the scenario and then talk about it being unethical ect.1)b) I literally had no idea what this wanted, something about different Ifrs for small entities. 0/8 for me
1 b) I thought it was about P&L vs OCI and recycling and I started to write about the technical artical.
December 7, 2016 at 11:04 am #354956Hi everyone. Glad you all got on well. Bits were tricky but actually I thought it was quite a fair exam. I liked the number of SFP workings in the I/S and I kept thinking of the easy marks for proportioning the sub and associate for 9/12 and 3/12 respectively. I think my NCI working was total rubbish. I thought the ethics question, principle currency and related party questions were opportunities to score really well. There was nothing in the exam that I had never ever come across before, but unfortunately you can’t remember everything, so I blew a few marks I really should have got!! I do not know I/S and particularly OCI that well so didn’t like 1b at all. I just didn’t get the strong hints they were making about the pensions, so I totally bluffed it, but just tried to use the question to answer it and hoped for application marks. If I was doing it again I would have spent a lot more time on the technical articles. I used the Revenue 5 step model for the inventory order in question one. The total sales were $22m (including the credit note) there or there abouts, so I proportioned each sale to the total and just said when they would recognise each sale- one was within a week etc. I used 3 booklets as one time I got 49 in an exam and I promised myself it would never ever happen again!!! If I have to write just one sentence on the end of every question for the last ten minutes that’s what I do!!!!!
December 7, 2016 at 11:35 am #354964In 1(a) I calculated loss on subsidiary disposal in CP&L because net assets od Ginny at disposal date increased significantly. At acquisition they were 114, next year 118 and at disposal plus 9/12 * TCI 48. For the building I assumed that 2 floors are PPE (owned-occupied by parent and by Boo-for group purposes BOO is also treated as owned occupied), remaining 8 floors as investment property. I calculated depreciation for PPE part only and revaluation gain for PPE included in OCI, revaluation for investment property in P&L.
Provision for repair I reversed-it is not in line with provision definition.
My main concerns regard revenue part-I think that discount should be included in price determination, opposite entry would be CR provision as customer will meet contract target.
Credit notes I also included as decrease of revenue.
1(b) here I mainly focused on accountign treatment and mismatch of showing remeasurement in OCI and rest of effects in P&L.
1(c) typical ethical question-I wrote taht directors are concerned to act ethically and honestly, about faithful presentation, about self-interest etc.Question 2.
(a)Functional currency-I believe it should be dolar, yen, dolar. The third company is acting more like distribution centre and it’s prices are determined by Suntory.
(b) and (c) I don’t remember tchem well
impairment of intangible assets and depreciation based on economic useful life
(c) related party-I write only few sentences as normally writing definiton who and what is related party would take me 20min…
question 3
(a) fair value measurement of financial asset. Company used level 3 inputs while level1/2 were available and thanks to this overstated assets.
(b) I don’t remember-maybe I will wrote later about it
(c) it was about valuation of net assets of acquired subsidiary and the fact that acquirer recognized gain on bargain purchase. I wrote that this may be indicator that fair value of net assets was not correctly measured as it was based on level 3 input cost-approach (cost of replacement). It would be better to use market-approach or income approach based on DCF method.December 7, 2016 at 11:46 am #354965For the revenue part – I thk discount should be included as per IFRS 15 step 3.
So the revenue should be 6000×960 + 7000×1000
They didn’t purchase over 15000, no further discount should be recognised
December 7, 2016 at 11:50 am #354966For investment property, only 8/10 should be resognisd = 96 x 8 / 10
And two floor PPE = 81 x 2 / 10Not sure if I rmb the number correctly
And the deprciation part I assume it is recorded correctly as per question said.December 7, 2016 at 1:12 pm #354987@kakahh said:
For investment property, only 8/10 should be resognisd = 96 x 8 / 10
And two floor PPE = 81 x 2 / 10Not sure if I rmb the number correctly
And the deprciation part I assume it is recorded correctly as per question said.Had the same idea, but divide it by “8” 2/8 & 6/8, I don’t know what happen to me when calculating
December 7, 2016 at 2:29 pm #355033Minor definitely dollar, was just an extension of parents.
For p and l got the difference in disposal to what they recorded so stated down to FV adjustment.
Investment property I put two floors for ias 16 as parent and their sub used them. Then rest to ias 40. So 1.2 to oci and 4.8 to p/l.
For fire damaged out through 6m as impairment loss and another 3 to balance transaction out.
For sales I didn’t give discount as they didn’t reach sales target. As already recorded 6m I put another 6.76m through revenue.
Hard notes which looked easy but tricky.
Best thing I done was all theory first and spent one hour on the numbers and got it finished on time. I seen people round me start on the numbers and still on it over 95/100mins plus later. So more than half the time for 1/3rd marks.
Does anyone know when we get the results?
December 7, 2016 at 3:26 pm #355080I think the results are out on 16th of January.
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘*** ACCA P2 December 2016 Exam was.. Instant Poll and comments ***’ is closed to new replies.