Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- July 17, 2023 at 12:20 am #688122
Passed with 57. This wasn’t just a paper but redemption time after failing it in the first attempt in 2020 by scoring 35. Thank you open tuition for all the support
June 7, 2023 at 7:50 pm #686405Refreeze . Change and unfreeze
June 7, 2023 at 1:23 am #686279Yes you can also talk about Kirk and the employee who disagreed with his views in the story section of cultural web and also power section where he was the sole decision maker ..
June 6, 2023 at 8:13 pm #686250I had the same paper
1) cultural web n leadership style (theory X n autocratic style) I also used the 3 stages of changes to answer that2) Porter diamond factors
3) Integrated reporting
4) outsource – daily transaction, manual process n end of month work
Inhouse – toy production n customer service
June 6, 2023 at 7:57 pm #686246I had the same paper I know it was crazy especially when you have 3 countries to analyze
June 6, 2023 at 6:41 pm #686223From Canada
1) cultural web and leadership style
2) industry attractiveness ( 3 countries to compare) and types of risk
3) Integrated reporting
4) outsourcing or in-house of finance functionJune 11, 2019 at 9:56 pm #520243Sir I have noticed that acca no longer provides us with those 15 minutes reading time In cbe. I remember sitting for F5 n by 9 am we started and by 12 sharp we were done. That’s a big let off
June 7, 2019 at 6:10 am #519484@johnlog said:
I had a very bad experience at my exam centre writing Pm.
i’ve written a mitigating complain in respect of that and i hope ACCA considers cuz i hate to read for pm again.Yes same here in such tough exams you need a peaceful mind to counter the paper. I too had a lot of issues bdw where did you complain?
June 6, 2019 at 9:49 pm #519449@tudd94 said:
My time management was way off 🙁
Section A was OK I guess, I struggled with the payoff table asking you to provide two values that would fit the grid. Section B was fine up until the concert question came up… I got a margin of safety of 85%. Things went a little worse when it was asking to give the profit figures after break even is considered whilst excluding the private booths… I knew the formulae perfectly yet I couldn’t get back to the numbers provided. I had to end up rushing because I spent just over an hour on section A. Section C was crazy, a question on Balanced Scorecard, I knew it had something to do with Kaplan and Norton’s model, sadly I couldn’t remember it with the time pressure. The 16 mark question on Non financial performance measures came as a shock. I put in 2 bullet points with the measures which I thought might be relevant and that was it! The last questions on section C related to expenditure budget (I managed to submit something whilst excluding the depreciation charges as I recalled from an old paper not to include it in expenditures… but I maybe wrong), incremental budgeting and zero based. I managed to write a paragraph under each of the discussion parts but it may not be enough to get a good mark. I was hoping for more calculations but alas the worst came to pass…I put in one disadvantage for incremental budgeting, in that it builds upon past inefficiencies and then I moved onto suggesting using a zero based approach for arriving at better costs, this might have not been in the scope of the question. The last part on zero based budgeting, I could just about describe it but I’m not sure if was enough. Well I’ve learnt a lot from the experience. It would have been easier if they gave me a question on ABC costing or Lifecyle or the topics that I focused my revision on! Even a EMA question would have been a blessing… They should give us noise cancelling headphones, I hated the keyboard bashing noises… kept getting distracted. Oh well, you live and learn, sure I’ll pass it on my next attempt!Exactly the typing sounds really disturbs you and it has definitely somehow costed us few marks n plus I noticed they no longer give us the extra 15 minutes which we used to get in the paper based
June 5, 2019 at 12:05 pm #519080that’s the problem doing your paper cbe based. the paper was fine but we went short of time because it takes time to type n perform calculations on excel plus the typing sounds all over the room disturbs your concentration
December 7, 2018 at 9:22 pm #488343@sarah1905 said:
Glad to see others got a negative NPV for the question in section C, i feel a little better about knowing that i though i had messed up somewhere. I had the exam with the debt/equity question in section c as well. Generally though it was a horrible paper a lot of tricky questions and loads where you had to write your own answer in the multiple choice section. Was hoping for a WACC question but didn’t even get a 2 mark oneIt seems you totally had a different paper because we had nothing about wacc n the normal Npv qn in today’s paper
December 7, 2018 at 9:06 pm #488335Yes lease was cheaper in both the options. There were only 3 items to include in npv which was the TAD relief, residual value n investment cost at year 0. The rate you had to use was the IRR post tax given in the qn. While calculating Npv without tax effect you had to remove tax from that IRR. The interest rate given was only used for calculating lease (post tax cost of borrowing)
December 7, 2016 at 12:31 pm #354976@asakar said:
Hello,On the g/w calculation, I remeber that i was double checking should we take acquired from S shares or given shares (Parent gave), and i am sure we should have taken the acquired shares as that was said in question… “1.62 for every share acquired”
In the subsidary equity it had 15000
N 60% was owned by the patent so u take 60/100 X 15000 X 2/3 X 1.62December 7, 2016 at 12:16 pm #354973@fokum said:
what was the approach to the MCQ where the consolidated ppe was required and a plant of carrying amt 70000 was disposed on 1/something/20×7It was a purp we had to remove depreciation from both the figures n the difference between value of the item transferred and value before transfer
December 7, 2016 at 12:12 pm #354970@garriec said:
What did people get for the weighted average shares MPQ?Think I had A)2125000.
2000000 for 9months, and 2500000 for 3 months, with the assumption the share values were there to throw me off?
I didn’t go over much share stuff so wasn’t sure if the TERP was relevant.
I calculated terp and then a bonus fraction n thn calculated wans. the answer I got wasn’t thr in the option but option C was close to my answer as the first 3 numbers wer same though idk if m ryt
December 6, 2016 at 7:32 pm #354707When doing unwinding the discount you charge to finance cost which is split to 9 months and charged?
December 6, 2016 at 6:07 pm #354655In section B did we had to capitalize the transaction cost as it said it hold for trading purpose? It hold it first for 1 year
December 5, 2016 at 5:02 pm #354104when a parent company sales goods to associate so does the purp be added to the cost of sales in profit or loss and inventory in sfp
December 5, 2016 at 4:24 pm #354049Sir I have question regarding consolidation, when an parent sells goods to associate and will the unrealized profit made on it be added to cost of sales and inventory? And what if the associate sells goods to the parent company how is the URP treated?
June 9, 2016 at 6:26 pm #321647@sally925 your right it’s earlier of the two dates and all bonuses fall under 2014/15 tax year
June 9, 2016 at 5:22 pm #321579We had to take all the 3 bonuses for employment income purpose? As all fall under tax year
- AuthorPosts