Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- June 6, 2013 at 1:51 pm #129764
<cite>@tautietis said:</cite>
funny enough, you said exactly the same thing about 2011 P4 paper.. obviously you haven’t done it..Well spotted – what a nasty oxygen thief
June 4, 2013 at 4:10 pm #128990Awful, very upset 🙁 like the subject, feel I understand it, well revised but totally failed today. Too much to read, too many calcs, too many interdependencies within qs so I couldn’t pick up the subsequent parts’ marks. the beta blocker got me too – needed rm? put ke at 10% but that seemed to produce crazy figs an went into a blind panic…
March 28, 2012 at 9:41 am #95330Many thanks John, much appreciated ( and will do 🙂 )
August 22, 2011 at 9:19 am #8691667% – but lower than I thought…
August 22, 2011 at 9:13 am #87002Failed with 47% – pretty shocked, but then again, she did totally change the question approach so maybe I misunderstood the requirement
June 7, 2011 at 9:32 pm #83479I felt confident before the exam, I had studied hard and flt I knew the paper but this was nothing like any practice question I had seen… content and wording was very strange…The time pressure was phenomenal and what was all the cross-cross-cross referencing within the questions and the multiple location requirements?
Question 2 was a disaster – what were we expected to do for (a)?
Can’t even guess how well/badly I performed 🙁
Good luck all
- AuthorPosts