Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
<cite>@tautietis said:</cite>
funny enough, you said exactly the same thing about 2011 P4 paper.. obviously you haven’t done it..Well spotted – what a nasty oxygen thief
Awful, very upset 🙁 like the subject, feel I understand it, well revised but totally failed today. Too much to read, too many calcs, too many interdependencies within qs so I couldn’t pick up the subsequent parts’ marks. the beta blocker got me too – needed rm? put ke at 10% but that seemed to produce crazy figs an went into a blind panic…
56% – but I thought I done so much better. I’d love to know where I lost marks…
Failed with 47% – pretty shocked, but then again, she did totally change the question approach so maybe I misunderstood the requirement
I felt confident before the exam, I had studied hard and flt I knew the paper but this was nothing like any practice question I had seen… content and wording was very strange…The time pressure was phenomenal and what was all the cross-cross-cross referencing within the questions and the multiple location requirements?
Question 2 was a disaster – what were we expected to do for (a)?
Can’t even guess how well/badly I performed 🙁
Good luck all