Forum Replies Created
- Posts
sir i solved it but i had answer which is not in options
i ignore point a because drawings has no affect on the profit
for point b, i add 420 to remove expense and then add further 420 as revenue
for point c i deduct 300 because rental income not goes to profit
for last point i add 200 as revenue
but i still not got any of above option
is i am doing right please help meKPI are measure of critical success factor
For above example the KPI are
Percentage of deliveries in time
Percentage of secured deliveries
Quantitative measure
Profit measure
Sales measureYes mike i thiink you are right i need to think first but its satisfiction that i wanted about my thinking i thinked but at the moment i want to confirm that i am thinking right
but its ok i will not ask such type of questions againmike if director goes beyond his power which is given to him by article then he is liable to company but that contract which he made to other party on behalf of company is still binding on company is it correct
the other party is customer supplier or other party to which company is dealing through director
mike the concept is that lets say a 50p share is subdivided into 10p five share this is not change of class right as the voting right per share is 1 as previous
but lets say company pass resolution that each oridinary share hold addtional 1 vote per share
which means now oridinary holder has 2 voting right per share which is previously one per share this is change of class right
its correct mikehe is saying in question by subdividing shares to increase voting strenght so thats right of holder and they are increasing their strenght so it change of right
mike you mean its lender of floating charge who has to be notified about the fixed charge and if he agrees to create the fixed charge on same asset then its effective is i am correct
mike you mean that if new lender know about the floating charge on asset and negative pledge clause then the fixed charge on same asset is effective
its c option in bpp the reason they give is that the company act protest the interest of third party when company is acting outside the scope of the company
mike so if its ineffective in case of third party then option c is correct one
sorry mike buts its my mind developed in this way i always thinks and wants to fully get knowledge about things i believe that learn things with full concept is good but sorry for asking to much questions
yes but if the david lets suppose contract to give services for 2 years and after one year he retire from giving service then its ok he is not be forced to give service but mike its breach of contract and the manchester united may loss from breach
mike is court grant damages as remedy in casewhat is crystalization of charge and mike when the loan is secured with asset then what is charge on that asset means please explain this simply
mike but in case foss vs harbottle 1843
two minority shareholder initiated legal proceedings against ,among others,the directors of company.they claimed that the directors had misapplied the companys assets
the court dismissed the claim and held that when a company is wronged by its directors it is only the company that has standing to sue
mike why court dismissed the directors are liable to shareholderi had cleared 8 papers by self study i lift f4 as i think its boring to study f4 now after ammendments now i think i have to take it with p2