• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for December 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Profile picture of
Active 5 years ago
  • Topics: 0
  • Replies: 22
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 16, 2017 at 6:50 am #367299
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    60% – second try.
    Good that the question were more structured than the september exam.
    Congrats to all that passed.
    Don’t stop pushing for those who failed.

    December 8, 2016 at 5:23 pm #362339
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Q1 a.
    1st subsidiary – Dog, however of strategic importance as it supplies intragroup.
    2nd subsidiary – Star – grow, finance, wait until market matures and the “milk the cow”!
    3rd – Cash Cow – hold, harvest. Inflows to be used to finance star

    December 8, 2016 at 5:02 pm #362325
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    gulshahbaz, not everything. I was out of project management. I guess I got maybe 10 out of 32points for part b from Q1.

    December 8, 2016 at 4:54 pm #362317
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    gulshahbaz, if you ask me, then the answer is “nope”.
    I had 1, 3 and 4.

    December 8, 2016 at 4:36 pm #362312
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Q1:
    a. Portfolio Analysis – Boston Consulting Group Matrix – 18 marks
    b. Memo on Project management / Financial Appraisal – 32 marks

    Q2:
    a. Regression analysis – 15 marks
    b. Big Data – 10 marks

    Q3:
    a. Marketing Mix using emarketing – 15 marks
    b. e-procurement – 10 marks

    Q4:
    a. Cultural web – 15 marks
    b. Continuing Development / The learning organisation – 5 marks each

    I like the new format. Now they don’t mash 3 topics into one question.
    It was really straightforward. You just had to study.

    July 18, 2016 at 9:45 am #326823
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    58% passed. the sit was peculiar. thought it would be around 50%.
    Thanks opentuition. Congrats for everybody who passed.

    June 9, 2016 at 9:20 pm #321757
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    in opentuition notes CLARISSA stands for “Role and function of the audit committee”

    June 9, 2016 at 7:02 pm #321673
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    dpsarros, i really don’t remember…
    My answer of role: CLARISSA. And I think it will get some points.

    June 9, 2016 at 4:07 pm #321514
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    what about Q2?
    1. CPD?
    2. Kohlberg conventional level?

    June 9, 2016 at 4:04 pm #321510
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @dpsarros said:
    Yes maybe it s a tricky question..and the correct answer is low/low…why is the question referred to 2 stakeholders of the same category..?I don t know..

    haha)) had the same logic
    Besides that, I wrote that Library users could as well benefit from the park (leisure, recreation purposes), therefore their interest is somehow split. I don’t think they want that library so bad that they would go against the development of the city and the minimum 500 jobs the society will gain. ah, and the unemployment group might as well cease to exist 🙂

    June 9, 2016 at 3:51 pm #321497
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    dpsarros, meaning that Library Users are in the Low / Low category?

    June 9, 2016 at 3:36 pm #321490
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @david1988 said:
    3 stakeholders were libary users, housing association and science company providing landscaping

    I put them as follows:

    Libarary users – High interest, low power (keep informed)
    Housing association – High interest, High power (Key player so need to meet and discuss issues ASAP)
    Science company – High interest, low power (keep informed)

    Do you want to say the Housing association has more power than the Science Company that has as a shareholder the local government?
    I would say the power is low, as they have no legal power, but merely a moral one (to not be kicked out of their rented flats).
    The Science Company has and the power and the interest. So High / High, I suppose.

    Regarding Library users, I think you are right. I wrote Low / Low, however, they are interested, though I considered their Interest as insignificant … my bad.

    June 9, 2016 at 2:31 pm #321465
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Ways of increasing the influence:
    1. Sue the Local Government. Even if they do not win the case, it will delay the demolition.
    2. Refuse to leave the premises.
    3. Increase to public sensibility, via press, TV, media.

    Not sure if this is what the examiner actually wants to hear from us.

    Regarding the Mendelow, what did you write? how did you categories the stakeholders?

    Mine was:
    – Government / Shareholder – High Power / High Interest
    – Public Library Potential Users – Low Power / Low Interest
    – Tenants of the social housing – Low Power / High Interest.

    Can anyone confirm / infirm it?

    June 9, 2016 at 11:23 am #321408
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @david1988Second part was looking at his role as a NED and effectiveness.

    I think the chief of audit committee was a NED…

    June 9, 2016 at 10:21 am #321397
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    vipulv, the statement I guess was 20 or 22 marks, including the 4.
    The statement was all blah blah. I guess only few marks on description of transparency and fairness, the rest was pure water, same ideas from point a, b, c.
    Such a disappointment.

    Agree with everybody else, there were very few subjects and models.

    PS, I used CLARISSA for roles of audit committee.
    Besides that, I wrote that the head was quite incompetent, didn’t have financial expertise, didn’t consider the head of internal auditor’s threats to independence and didn’t review him, just accepting the report.

    Regarding Head of Internal Auditor, the threats I wrote were:
    – Familiarity (10+ years, friendly with everybody, friend at the ware house)
    – Self-Interest (in order to preserve the friendships he has, even maybe some financial interest in form of bribe from the warehouse-keeper)
    – Self-review (could be present considering 10 years of activity, which could mean that he participated in the design and implementation of some of the internal controls)
    – Intimidation (he could have been intimidated, threatened by his old boss at his ex-department, as well as being blackmailed by the warehouse friend in further actions if he had “closed an eye” on the issues present).
    – advocacy – mentioned about it, but couldn’t identify any.

    June 8, 2016 at 3:01 pm #320875
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    it wasn’t complicated, but in my opinion the volume was too much.
    Didn’t have time to complete everything.
    I got Q 2 and Q 3.

    The CDP was a pain in the a**, as haven’t much focused on that during the study.

    Hopefully 50 marks…
    Will see..

    January 18, 2016 at 1:12 am #295271
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Received the mail at 00:07 GMT 0.
    First attempt – 54%.
    Thank you, OpenTuition.

    January 7, 2016 at 9:48 am #293665
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Now the waiting is more intense than the times we waited 3 months to get the results!
    I am glad about the introduction of Spring and Fall exam sessions. Now we can focus more on ACCA than the time when there were sessions every half a year. In the meantime you could relax..now, not.

    I attended F9. Hope I will get a pass.
    Good luck everybody!

    December 14, 2015 at 8:46 am #291651
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Agree with you.
    Leading presumes you have the funds now. However, you can still deposit them at a bank account and get the interest rate, or you should borrow them.
    I didn’t even consider leading.

    December 11, 2015 at 4:30 pm #291062
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    I messed it up a little…
    A just skipped the first question and forgot about it. when revising the questions I realized I skipped it! In the last 10 minutes tried to write anything…however…i think 10 mark are lost.
    The question was not so hard, though…
    The hardest for me was the 5th..

    On the multiple I got:
    1. B
    2. A
    3. A
    4. A
    5. B
    6. D
    7. D
    8. C
    9. C
    10. D
    11. A
    12. A
    13. B
    14. C
    15. A
    16. A
    17. B
    18. B
    19. A
    20. A

    too many “a”s….))

    Q 1 – as said above – said only about the semi strong market. skipped the IRR for redeemable debt…calculated the ratio without it..

    Q 2 – I got that forward was cheaper… You borrow dollars to buy pesos to put in bank and at the maturity you just pay the supplier.. b) it was about futures (almost confused it with forward) – it is cheaper, can be sold on the market, are not obligatory, though not so flexible….

    Q 3 – The discount policy is to be chosen – it brings benefit to the entity. I included the 10% profit margin for the sales volume difference (i guess was 20% increase in credit sales). If you exclude it – it is negative. It wrote that it shall be included, as the competition is fierce and the above profit is opportunity cost if not used…
    b) About foreign clients – Wasn’t they asking about credit risk and not fx risk? I wrote that the best was to diminish risk is to ask for advance payments / to have a bank as an intermediary and to get a good credit risk department if the main business is export based.. (if it was about fx, then I’m screwed)

    Q 4 – The sales price / cost shall be inflated starting with the first year. Fixed cost not inflated. Included the wacc movement only (no initial balance). Tax calculated on depreciation. Got a positive NPV. I wrote that they must consider maybe a better machine, as the last two years it was working on full capacity (400,000), so maintenance costs could get up as well as maybe some oportunity costs could arrise… anyway, not important.
    b) the term just got out of my head ….said “hard and soft limitation of financing” instead of “capital rationing”…hopefully the characteristics are correct and will get some marks..

    Q 5 – first started with part b, as wacc is my achilles heel…
    part a – “i have no idea what I’m doing”. After I realised I skipped question 1, got panicked don’t remember what i wrote….

    Hopefully will get good MCQ and 2 / 3 / 4 right and get the pass rate….

    Any other MCQs?

    October 19, 2015 at 10:03 am #277404
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    pass 51%… phew…

    September 11, 2015 at 7:29 am #271186
    mysterysobieski
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    my MCQ choices are below. Started to check in the Study Text, couple of them are incorrect, so I quit… I’ll wait for the results in October 🙂 no stress..

    The MCQ were pretty tricky… didn’t like them.
    The questions were alright. The 15 points questions were straightforward.
    The inheritance tax question was lame as well…

    MCQ:
    1. B
    2. A
    3. D
    4. C
    5. B
    6. B
    7. D
    8. A
    9. C
    10. A
    11.C
    12. D
    13. D
    14. B
    15. B

    Hope at least 7 are correct 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 22 posts - 1 through 22 (of 22 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Ejueyitsi-Toju on FM Chapter 15 Questions Test 2 – The valuation of securities – theoretical approach
  • Burtv1610 on Financial instruments – convertible debentures – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • BhavitB on Objectives of organisations – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Moliselumka on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • Luqman12 on The use of computers in accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) / FIA FFA

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in