• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

sbucker

Profile picture of sbucker
Active 4 years ago
  • Topics: 0
  • Replies: 3
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 17, 2020 at 7:11 pm #580952
    d710d7bf7372353ca18e28c9d68473b869becc3b1ed66664b646df573539f95d 80sbucker
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Thank you so much for your reply. I’m trying to understand the process account for it:
    On the debit side:
    Materials $800
    Labour $1500
    Overheads $1000
    Total 3300

    On the credit side:
    Normal loss 0
    Output 150kg *19.59 = $2938.5
    Abnormal loss $361.5 (balancing figure)
    Total = 3300

    The abnormal loss value should be the balancing figure 361.5. Analysing the figure: 30*4.44 + 15*15.15. Am I correctly understanding?

    August 17, 2020 at 3:26 pm #580918
    d710d7bf7372353ca18e28c9d68473b869becc3b1ed66664b646df573539f95d 80sbucker
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    I’m sorry. Here the process is fully completed since there is no CWIP. Losses should have already been identified. So, why do we need to half the abnormal loss?

    August 17, 2020 at 2:54 pm #580913
    d710d7bf7372353ca18e28c9d68473b869becc3b1ed66664b646df573539f95d 80sbucker
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    “The approach is the same for labour and overheads, except that the abnormal loss will only have had half of the labour and overhead work. So we spread the total of $2,500 over 165kg (150 + 30/2). ”

    It is said that losses are identified when the process is 50% complete. Here the output is already 150kg meaning 150kg/200kg = 75% complete. All losses should have already been identified. Why do we need to half the abnormal loss ?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on EPS – diluted EPS Example – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • DeborahProspect on ACCA SBR Specimen Exam 2 Question 1
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 9 Pension Schemes TX-UK FA2023
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 9 Pension Schemes TX-UK FA2023

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in