• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Protected: sbucker

Profile picture of sbucker
Active 5 years ago
  • Topics: 0
  • Replies: 3
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 17, 2020 at 7:11 pm #580952
    Avatarsbucker
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    Thank you so much for your reply. I’m trying to understand the process account for it:
    On the debit side:
    Materials $800
    Labour $1500
    Overheads $1000
    Total 3300

    On the credit side:
    Normal loss 0
    Output 150kg *19.59 = $2938.5
    Abnormal loss $361.5 (balancing figure)
    Total = 3300

    The abnormal loss value should be the balancing figure 361.5. Analysing the figure: 30*4.44 + 15*15.15. Am I correctly understanding?

    August 17, 2020 at 3:26 pm #580918
    Avatarsbucker
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    I’m sorry. Here the process is fully completed since there is no CWIP. Losses should have already been identified. So, why do we need to half the abnormal loss?

    August 17, 2020 at 2:54 pm #580913
    Avatarsbucker
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    “The approach is the same for labour and overheads, except that the abnormal loss will only have had half of the labour and overhead work. So we spread the total of $2,500 over 165kg (150 + 30/2). ”

    It is said that losses are identified when the process is 50% complete. Here the output is already 150kg meaning 150kg/200kg = 75% complete. All losses should have already been identified. Why do we need to half the abnormal loss ?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • sadeekxasharma on FA Chapter 2 Questions The Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Profit or Loss
  • sadeekxasharma on FA Chapter 2 Questions The Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Profit or Loss
  • NomfundoM on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data
  • NomfundoM on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on Objectives of organisations – ACCA (AFM) lectures

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in