Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- December 24, 2015 at 1:45 pm #292706
My answers hardly exceeded 100 words per questions and were approved. I think that depends what you write rather than how much.
August 1, 2015 at 1:11 am #263695only below worked for me and I passed lasteam.
https://www.acca-business.org/pls/ecommerce/elopl001.p_loginAugust 1, 2015 at 12:52 am #263639As for the leaks:
Only https://www.acca-business.org/pls/ecommerce/elopl001.p_login was telling truth.
All other links shown no permission for me till the end but PASSED last exam YEAH!!!.
Only the one above shown i’m the finalist.July 28, 2015 at 8:53 am #262590When you’re desperately trying to save your life from drowning ship, then yes,i would call it panic with sense.
But all this fun above with links and ERS dates are just ridiculous..
Do you really think that people from ACCA are so stupid not to read all of this ?
They really must have fun reading all your seeeking on how to override their system.July 28, 2015 at 7:37 am #262576… and I received such email last year as well.
And I passed.
So don’t spread sensless panic.June 3, 2015 at 11:35 am #252394@tez
“planning of an initial audit engagement”.
questions are out.February 10, 2015 at 7:03 pm #227713may sound strange but:
F9 – easiest
P4 – hardestFebruary 8, 2015 at 12:40 am #22600854%, what a nasty exam! never ever.
December 3, 2014 at 10:11 am #216720I really can’t understand why people usually keep on starting in Q1 at P level.
I always do section B first as it’s more transparent to pick out data I need and less complex.
I finish it off as soon as I can as it;s visible right away what i can do and what I can’t.
And with clear conscienece I start struggling with complex Q1 till the very end of exam.
Everyone here seems to know how easily it;s to bog down with Q1 and hard to move on.
Not to mention the feeling that “I probably screw up Q1” which considerably influneces solving section B.
So why many people started with Q1 at this session when at first glance it was obvious that it’s nightmare.
I’m also sceptic about my passing however at least I have strong feeling that I did whatever I could at given conditions.
I attempted 100% of paper and even with the wrong approach, calculations and conclusions I did at least there’s a chance of getting mark for trying to solve the problem.
Strategy here is not empty word.June 9, 2014 at 9:32 pm #175572I disagree for 2a to use skimming.
he had small market share and he was ready to bear losses for next years.
so penetration I would say.June 9, 2014 at 8:27 pm #175540Damn, I didn’t expect TOWS. Is so similar to SWOT and easy to confuse.
February 8, 2014 at 12:16 am #156177sms, i always receive it immediately after 0.00 UK time. location – Poland.
February 8, 2014 at 12:15 am #156175sms, i always receive it immediately after 0.00 UK time.
February 8, 2014 at 12:07 am #15616260% as expected
February 8, 2014 at 12:05 am #156157released !
passed, yeah!!!December 5, 2013 at 10:59 am #150603Anyway, I expect nasty exam.
Last sitting was pretty straightforward resulted in highest pass rate ever.
I expect they will want to bring this down.
Anyone has the same impression ?August 8, 2013 at 7:36 am #13608950%.
Hoped a lot better. Strange paper as for expectations versus results.February 8, 2013 at 11:02 am #116056try to cover all questions, no matter how good or bad, but do answer all questions. do not focus on first 3 obvious questions. avoid stucking on first 3 questions to make them beautiful and added up, do that partially if time has run out and move on. remeber 1 mark only 1,8 minutes. stick to this strictly.
December 11, 2012 at 8:29 am #110308eee… my version is 35000+6200*3/12
December 8, 2012 at 7:26 pm #110302they say they don’t penalize twice for the same error.
December 7, 2012 at 11:59 am #110287December 6, 2012 at 7:23 pm #110273@atahenrii. Got the same.
June 19, 2012 at 9:03 am #101152It seems that you are right. Shit! I treated that like selling goods.
- AuthorPosts