Forum Replies Created
- Posts
My answers hardly exceeded 100 words per questions and were approved. I think that depends what you write rather than how much.
When you’re desperately trying to save your life from drowning ship, then yes,i would call it panic with sense.
But all this fun above with links and ERS dates are just ridiculous..
Do you really think that people from ACCA are so stupid not to read all of this ?
They really must have fun reading all your seeeking on how to override their system.… and I received such email last year as well.
And I passed.
So don’t spread sensless panic.@tez
“planning of an initial audit engagement”.
questions are out.I really can’t understand why people usually keep on starting in Q1 at P level.
I always do section B first as it’s more transparent to pick out data I need and less complex.
I finish it off as soon as I can as it;s visible right away what i can do and what I can’t.
And with clear conscienece I start struggling with complex Q1 till the very end of exam.
Everyone here seems to know how easily it;s to bog down with Q1 and hard to move on.
Not to mention the feeling that “I probably screw up Q1” which considerably influneces solving section B.
So why many people started with Q1 at this session when at first glance it was obvious that it’s nightmare.
I’m also sceptic about my passing however at least I have strong feeling that I did whatever I could at given conditions.
I attempted 100% of paper and even with the wrong approach, calculations and conclusions I did at least there’s a chance of getting mark for trying to solve the problem.
Strategy here is not empty word.I disagree for 2a to use skimming.
he had small market share and he was ready to bear losses for next years.
so penetration I would say.the question is what about the other side of story.
i mean if you explained the problem from the case but didn’t refer to textbook.
like in 1a(ii): “discuss the tensions”: examiner probably required to mention stakeholders claim which i did not however discussed well.
btw: i don’t understand what’s the point in giving vague questions.
people spend more time on thinking what’s in examiner’s head than focusing on answer itself.Anyway, I expect nasty exam.
Last sitting was pretty straightforward resulted in highest pass rate ever.
I expect they will want to bring this down.
Anyone has the same impression ?try to cover all questions, no matter how good or bad, but do answer all questions. do not focus on first 3 obvious questions. avoid stucking on first 3 questions to make them beautiful and added up, do that partially if time has run out and move on. remeber 1 mark only 1,8 minutes. stick to this strictly.
@ban123 – that was given: value of works certified