Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- June 5, 2018 at 8:06 am #456268
Colleagues,
There was no grants. It was tenders. Government gives no money but give the orders/work to do.
August 4, 2017 at 9:08 pm #400456Got the message:)
I meant that throughput is very common with marginal contribution ( which is used for CVP analysis)
August 4, 2017 at 9:02 pm #400455Throw study text… Use lectures here and take revision book
August 4, 2017 at 9:00 pm #400454Ok, got the message, sorry.
But honestly dream one day to become tutor at least part time:)
I will continue in another forum, but questions there are not as technical and relevant to paper as in this forum, it more administrative one:(
August 4, 2017 at 4:59 pm #400416Think about contribution to CVP approach. Very common.
August 4, 2017 at 4:28 pm #40041340 and 35 This is not u (units), this is contribution pu. So you divide fix cost into contribution up and learn how much units is BEP. To find 35 puyou review you contributing (you change staff cost from fix to variable) by subtracting additional 200/40=5 out
August 4, 2017 at 4:14 pm #400409P5 is great, not need to learn lectures. Just solve interesting business cases.
August 4, 2017 at 4:12 pm #400407Accaglobal.com
Na for all countries, for Pakistan, Malaysia, you find with place . Search for place winners.
For Russia I didn’t find, also wish to know my place worldwide
August 4, 2017 at 3:02 pm #400400prize winner with 75:) how do I know my rating world wide?
July 17, 2017 at 7:32 pm #397136Passed with 75 at first attempt, yahoo
June 7, 2017 at 6:38 pm #391528Why didnt Q3? I did Q3 this was easy, it was very common with F8 the waste in MIS. Also comment on KPIs for 5S measures and lean principles. Q2, Q4 and part 1,2, and NEDs of Q1 was disaster:)
June 7, 2017 at 6:31 pm #391523@zahra1003 said:
The paper was a complete disaster
Acca is money minded
How can a paper be like this
Q1 i) was on revised budgeting for q1 by using incremental budegeting (6 m)
ii) prepare rolling budget for a division (6m)
iii) was on how the 4 division has been performinng and recommend (19m)
IV) non executive directors comment (6m)
V) cant remember the question was on 12m and i left this part out ofq2 was on performance management calculation of roce and part was
on balance scorecardq3 was on current performance issues and how to add (10m)
Use of lean information for new proposed measures (6m)
Use of lean 5s for the proposed measures (11m)Q4 a company was about to acquire another company and both compagnies info was given… benefits and consequences of use of employees bonus scheme to assess if can be used in both business(8m)… use of pest for employees bonus scheme in both business(6m) and last was on mckinsey 7s model by using structure strategy style and value base for both businesses and recommend kpi to be appropriate (11)
Overall was not expecting budegeting and others questions was lengthy and very time consuming. Very disappointed with the paper setting
V) cant remember the question was on 12m and i left this part out of – was about changing role of accountant.
June 7, 2017 at 5:10 pm #391409I got ROCE 12% for year 1 and 22% for year, so wrote it would be rejected even since 2 years seems very good.
June 7, 2017 at 5:09 pm #391407What did you write for NED in Q1? What did he want?))
August 11, 2015 at 11:40 am #266711Passed with 65, yaahoo
- AuthorPosts