• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

fcybbm

Profile picture of fcybbm
Active 4 years ago
  • Topics: 1
  • Replies: 2
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 11, 2020 at 4:30 pm #580136
    mysteryfcybbm
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Hi John,

    Thank you very much for your detailed explanation. Everything suddenly makes sense 🙂

    August 11, 2020 at 2:11 am #579886
    mysteryfcybbm
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Hi John,

    Thank you very much for your clarification.

    I’m trying to figure out a correct answer to this question: it seems that the option in question is: if project value in the future exceeds $35m, then exercise the option and go for the additional investment of $35m, if project value falls below $35m, and do not invest further. It seems that the two $7m initial investments were not considered in the option at all, and they would have been incurred no matter what.

    So can we consider the $7m investments separately to the $35m further investment and future cash inflows?

    If we completely ignore the two $7m investments:

    The option value is still unchanged at $9.127m, however, the NPV of the project is -$28.42+$18.28+$11.86+$5.93+$2.68=$10.33m. It looks like the project value with option is lower than the project value without option to delay-this gives a negative value added by the option of delay, but in theory an option couldn’t lower value of a project…

    I’m confused by the calculation results… Could you please help to see what’s wrong here? Thank you very much!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Elikplim on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Elikplim on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • shravanm on ACCA AAA Employability and Technology Skills
  • MitaP on Presentation of Financial Statements (IAS 1) – ACCA Strategic Business Reporting (SBR) lectures
  • John Moffat on Activity Based Costing part 1 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in