• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

fcybbm

Profile picture of fcybbm
Active 5 years ago
  • Topics: 1
  • Replies: 2
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 11, 2020 at 4:30 pm #580136
    Avatarfcybbm
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Hi John,

    Thank you very much for your detailed explanation. Everything suddenly makes sense 🙂

    August 11, 2020 at 2:11 am #579886
    Avatarfcybbm
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Hi John,

    Thank you very much for your clarification.

    I’m trying to figure out a correct answer to this question: it seems that the option in question is: if project value in the future exceeds $35m, then exercise the option and go for the additional investment of $35m, if project value falls below $35m, and do not invest further. It seems that the two $7m initial investments were not considered in the option at all, and they would have been incurred no matter what.

    So can we consider the $7m investments separately to the $35m further investment and future cash inflows?

    If we completely ignore the two $7m investments:

    The option value is still unchanged at $9.127m, however, the NPV of the project is -$28.42+$18.28+$11.86+$5.93+$2.68=$10.33m. It looks like the project value with option is lower than the project value without option to delay-this gives a negative value added by the option of delay, but in theory an option couldn’t lower value of a project…

    I’m confused by the calculation results… Could you please help to see what’s wrong here? Thank you very much!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • melucina15 on Organisational culture – ACCA Paper BT
  • harsh9 on Regulatory framework – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • LiliaDvornikova on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 20 Trading and other losses – Companies
  • Zidanda on The valuation of debt finance, and duration (part 1) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • Davud on FA Chapter 21 Questions IAS 38 – Intangible Assets: Goodwill, Research and Development

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in