• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Elena

Profile picture of Elena
Active 5 years ago
  • Topics: 0
  • Replies: 15
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 6, 2019 at 6:58 pm #545338
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    Could anybody tell me how should we take into account interest on debt in APV, Q1:

    Is it to be deducted out of operating profit in the base case NPV (and discounted by all-equity rate)? How then the tax rate could be applied to the profit AFTER interest?

    Or is it to be included in “other costs” (and discounted by the free-rate)?

    What is the rule and the logic of it?

    January 15, 2019 at 12:46 pm #502049
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    Could smb tell if where will be available all answers on the paper and when?

    December 3, 2018 at 2:08 pm #486946
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    The part 1 was really a disaster. I”m not a native english speaker so it took lots of time just to understand what is the meaning of the questions! They were unusual and strange, as for me. Now I”m trying to remember at least one of the questions from part1 and I can”t((

    That is my last paper in the fundamentals level and only a miracle will help me to pass)
    Sorry for offtop)

    From the part2: one of the latest question

    “The profit before tax is about 2.3 mln. The development of a new product was capitalised at a sum of 0.5 mln. The criterea for capitalization was not met. The CFO refuses to make adjustment because thinks the error is not material. How this situation will affect the audit report?”

    I answered, that the error is material and it is pervasive (the PPE is overstated, the expenses are underestimated and the profit is overestimated). So the adverse opinion should be issued.
    What do you think?

    December 8, 2017 at 6:30 pm #422060
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    @jmmyjimmy said:
    thanks, my reply was shares as well.

    i remember section b question about money market vs forward. i had answer around USD 3k…

    there was also the question about investors, who behave rationally regarding the news on the company. does anyone remember given options?

    Yes, about 3.177 smth like this.
    I chose “the prices will NOT react on the announcements”
    (I suppose for the semi-strong market the prices WILL react, and the aim was to choose the incorrect answer; other options I do not remember unfortunately)

    December 8, 2017 at 6:23 pm #422055
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    @kanchandhankar said:
    I read on open tuitions in a reply by John Moffat .
    when we are calculating Wacc on mv , mv of equity effectively already includes the reserves

    Yes, I suppose you are right, it is very logically !
    Was my mistake.

    December 8, 2017 at 6:13 pm #422046
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    @kanchandhankar said:

    I chose the same (ordinary shares as the most risky).

    December 8, 2017 at 5:58 pm #422039
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    @kanchandhankar said:
    I remember doing same way

    Why did you use 9% ?
    We should calculate the increase rate for dividend:
    today’ dividend = 0.20, 5 years ago dividend = 0.17.
    rate approximately = 4.1% (0.17 * 1.041^5 = 0.20)

    Am I not right ?

    December 8, 2017 at 5:50 pm #422033
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    @kanchandhankar said:
    One Mcq was about working capital element
    1. I chose sales wasn’t working capital element.
    2. Other Mcq about calculating cash cycle .
    3. There was one with redeemable preference share part of equity ?
    4. In q 31 with Wacc reserve to be included or not .?
    I didn’t .

    1. agree
    2. inventory + receivables – payables.
    3. I put “NO” because logically it is exactly the same as debt.
    4. I added reserves to equity, i.e. included.

    December 8, 2017 at 5:38 pm #422024
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    @aagshin said:
    The same question is also interesting for me. i calculated for 10 years. There wasnt enough space in my answer blank for 10 years but I did it))))
    Dont know right or not)) Was it suppose to be for 4 years??

    There is no need to use 10 years. The depreciation is linear,
    so NPV of tax benefit = 50mln / 10years * 25% * annuity@10years.

    December 8, 2017 at 5:33 pm #422020
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    @aagshin said:
    Wasnt it closing receivable?? I choosed closing/sales*365=57. with average receivables it made 72 I think. I choosed 57. Am i right?? if not, why?

    I suppose it should be the average receivables. It’s more logic, the closing balance we take when we don’t have the information about the average.

    December 8, 2017 at 5:29 pm #422018
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    does anyone remember the answer for the ROCE:
    smth like “company should not undertake the projects with ROCE less then the average of the company” ?

    December 8, 2017 at 5:01 pm #421998
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    @limweikiat said:
    Hey guys, what’s the answer for the commercial paper question?
    It was something like: 40 days, 365 days a year, $10000 $9967

    as I remember there was 45 days, 9938 and 360 days, so:
    10000-9938=62
    62/9938=0.624% for 45 days
    360/45=8
    1.00624^8=5.1%
    (the figure may be a little different but the calculation was like this)

    December 8, 2017 at 4:43 pm #421974
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    Agree with the “customers will buy cheaper abroad” and 2.4 years for the payback.

    What was the answer about the risk for purchases abroad (economic / transaction / translation)? I chose “economic+transaction”.

    December 8, 2017 at 3:46 pm #421935
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    Much more easier then the previous one. The previous was really inadequate and I’m glad that the ACCA administration has made improvements in the last version.

    December 4, 2014 at 5:17 pm #217532
    c239b64a281e79a8ee1bf8391495768d6a8bc353a4d00816443dbbd65d7cb3b8 80Elena
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 15
    • ☆

    About shadow price just remember how to calculate it:

    1. we know the contribution if we have the initial quantity of the resource;
    2. we calculate the contribution if we have the initial quantity of the resource + 1 unit (nothing else changes, i.e. the price of the additional unit stays the same, it is not free of charge).
    3. substracting 1 from 2 gives the “shadow price”.

    So the real price to pay for the additional units = its initial cost + shadow price, and the answer comes to 56.

    If I’m wrong please make me correct or please publish here the same question from BPP mock exam with the decision.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 15 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • sallauddinsk on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • kmottea on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • kmottea on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Hamza101 on Sub-leases – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • AdityaSairam on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in