Forum Replies Created
- Posts
I took P5 and got 49 on my first attempt paid for review and within 24 hrs it came back no change its a waste of money as they dont actually remark the paper. It took me 7 attempts tp pass thank God this session i did it
I would say resit it while it fresh ..learn all the areas on syllabus outcome so that even if you didnt cover a topic it full it would seem forigen on the exam, loom at all examiner report and read articles.
best of luck.
I failed for the fourth time my marks 43, 45, 43,49 omg i didnt know where to turn my head last night i am absolutely gutted. im not giving up because i have come this way all by myself using my friend old notes and pass papers. Any thoughts about getting a review dont want to waste £52. I would love your feedback this is my final paper,
43%,45% &43 % three times now what do you do when you are so close, im going to give it m all for March really want to finish its my final paper
Fail again Im feeling sad getting in th 40s twice 5 marks away!!!! Dont want to waste my money on a review. Im just wondering whats the rationale for not publishing the answers can any one shed an insight.?
Fail 43 I found this to be the toughest paper. Am proud of myself I studies with materials from a freind. I went through most paper but not under exam condition, I think that was the second problem after trying to find out exactly what was required not enough time.
Am of the same opinion get a week break and start preparing for September im still hoping but not confident
I agree rubbish setting what was it really trying to acheive I have never seen so many apendix having to flick the paper to and fro
I didnt like the style of the paper how do you deal with four appendix in one qs when its already so long. It too jumbled up i would much prefer if section was divided in two like p7 it can be very off putting. What choice do you really have do you decide to do section B first. To me i feel you need at least mins to ready qs 1. I wouldnt say it was hard i feel the style of the qs was confusing thus time wasted decipher. I guess Acca will be getting another £100