Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- December 2, 2013 at 3:32 pm #149179
Sparky, 12mln/2700=4 444,44, not 444
maybe it’s the reasonDecember 2, 2013 at 3:15 pm #149170Mo, thank you so much, now i understand
i’ve wrote the correct formula of TPAR but have made a stupid, really stupid mistake in calculations(((December 2, 2013 at 3:07 pm #149159wasty, as i understand we need to use black pen for the cover and it’s better to use it for the answers too. For the first time i used the blue but examinator told us that it’s better to use black pen inside question paper too. today i’ve used the only black
December 2, 2013 at 3:01 pm #149155hello! Guys, how do you get TPAR more 1??? I get the both one is less than 1 ((( and i really dont understand what’s wrong – for example for the large panels (the first product) material price was about 4200$ per unit and machine M time for the product was about 1.6 per unit, therefore Return per factory hours was 2625 (approximately, i don’t remember the precise numbers). Cost per factory hours was 12000000/(5x12x50)=4000
So, the TPAR=3000/4000=0,75
And for the second product the TPAR was lower than for the first one.
Even if i’ll use coefficient of 0,9 to define time of machine M available, the TPAR will be less than 1
Where was i wrong?? - AuthorPosts