• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Daria

Profile picture of Daria
Active 6 years ago
  • Topics: 0
  • Replies: 4
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 2, 2013 at 3:32 pm #149179
    AvatarDaria
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Sparky, 12mln/2700=4 444,44, not 444
    maybe it’s the reason

    December 2, 2013 at 3:15 pm #149170
    AvatarDaria
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    Mo, thank you so much, now i understand
    i’ve wrote the correct formula of TPAR but have made a stupid, really stupid mistake in calculations(((

    December 2, 2013 at 3:07 pm #149159
    AvatarDaria
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    wasty, as i understand we need to use black pen for the cover and it’s better to use it for the answers too. For the first time i used the blue but examinator told us that it’s better to use black pen inside question paper too. today i’ve used the only black

    December 2, 2013 at 3:01 pm #149155
    AvatarDaria
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 4
    • ☆

    hello! Guys, how do you get TPAR more 1??? I get the both one is less than 1 ((( and i really dont understand what’s wrong – for example for the large panels (the first product) material price was about 4200$ per unit and machine M time for the product was about 1.6 per unit, therefore Return per factory hours was 2625 (approximately, i don’t remember the precise numbers). Cost per factory hours was 12000000/(5x12x50)=4000
    So, the TPAR=3000/4000=0,75
    And for the second product the TPAR was lower than for the first one.
    Even if i’ll use coefficient of 0,9 to define time of machine M available, the TPAR will be less than 1
    Where was i wrong??

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • TEDI on IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment – Initial Recognition – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • ChanNV on Framework – measurement – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • ChanNV on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Konstantinos43 on Financial Performance Measurement – Liquidity Measures – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hirak.5 on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 3 Property Income and Investments – Individuals

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in