Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- May 17, 2025 at 12:51 pm #717303
thats a good point, for some reason I assumed the question would explicity say give a conclusion. Thanks very much, I will keep an eye out for if the questions is specifcally asking for advice
May 17, 2025 at 12:50 pm #717302thanks very much really reassuring!
May 16, 2025 at 8:22 am #717288Hi Ken, my tutor strongly advised that if conclusions are not asked for then not to bother because of time constraints.
Will we lose marks if we dont include conclusions? Appreciate its a professional paper and a report without a conclusion even if not asked does not seem like a real life situation.
March 31, 2025 at 9:35 pm #716437hiya im interested 🙂
June 3, 2024 at 6:57 pm #706548did we all have the same paper? mine didnt sound like this
June 1, 2024 at 11:05 am #706380thank you so much Kim I really appreciate the detail you provide this is really helpful and reassuring, thanks again!
June 1, 2024 at 10:43 am #706370For example, if the procedure is to review the draft financial statement and confirm the provision has been recorded in line with IFRS.
Does that need to be developed further to confirm the assertion? This answer is what was also taught in the revision lectures by opentuition.
June 1, 2024 at 10:28 am #706363thank you, so the assertion tested must always be explicity stated for each procedure? There have been a few past papers where the answers dont do so so just want to check if its always required?
May 29, 2024 at 8:59 am #706213you are amazing thank you Kim!
May 28, 2024 at 3:32 pm #706186thank you for the response and additional insight it is really useful.
Perhaps I am taking this too far and overcomplicating things but if I am doing a substantive procedure for trade receivables…
Reviewing Board minutes to assess if there are any discussions regarding a significant customer in dispute….
Would this therefore not be a substantive procedure as the answer to that is simply a yes or no? so its just a TOC
- AuthorPosts