• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Cara1284

Profile picture of Cara1284
Active 12 years ago
  • Topics: 3
  • Replies: 5
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 25, 2012 at 11:16 pm #108452
    mysteryCara1284
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    yes right… i get it.

    November 15, 2012 at 1:21 pm #107439
    mysteryCara1284
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    This mayb outside the scope of F7 but if the following year, the rest of the goods is sold, is the eliminated pup reinstated to a/c for the realised profit?

    November 15, 2012 at 7:01 am #107437
    mysteryCara1284
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    U mean the parent co. always makes an unrealised profit when selling to its sub n if the goods are not sold by the end of the year, the whole unrealised profit is eliminated.

    N if say 2/3 of the goods r sold to outside customers, it woud mean that 2/3 of the unrealised profit made at first when selling to sub has been realised. Therefore both parent n sub can safely recognise the realised portion of the transaction n eliminate the unrealised profit made on the remaining yet unsold 1/3.

    Is that correct?

    November 8, 2012 at 6:23 am #106682
    mysteryCara1284
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    It’s getting clearer now, thanx!

    November 7, 2012 at 7:24 am #106680
    mysteryCara1284
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Since we don’t get to see the lecture for e.g 7, i don’t know if it was treated like e.g 8 & 9 but i’d assume so coz u do refer back to it in e.g 8.

    In the answer to e.g 8, there is no mention of the value of nci investment of $55,000 mentioned in e.g 7. Does it mean that if we’re told that ” Guido’s shares were worth $1.65 immediately before the acquisition by Ivona” , the value of nci investment given in eg.7 does not stand anymore or do we have to ignore nci investment of $55,000 given in eg.7 for the sake of e.g 8?

    Thank you.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • askar.turganbayev@gmail.com on AA Chapter 2 Questions
  • RashidMh on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hsaini on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in