• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams

Comments & Instant poll

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Cara1284

Profile picture of Cara1284
Active 13 years ago
  • Topics: 3
  • Replies: 5
  • ☆
  • Profile
  • Forums
  • Topics Started
  • Replies Created
  • Engagements

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 25, 2012 at 11:16 pm #108452
    mysteryCara1284
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    yes right… i get it.

    November 15, 2012 at 1:21 pm #107439
    mysteryCara1284
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    This mayb outside the scope of F7 but if the following year, the rest of the goods is sold, is the eliminated pup reinstated to a/c for the realised profit?

    November 15, 2012 at 7:01 am #107437
    mysteryCara1284
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    U mean the parent co. always makes an unrealised profit when selling to its sub n if the goods are not sold by the end of the year, the whole unrealised profit is eliminated.

    N if say 2/3 of the goods r sold to outside customers, it woud mean that 2/3 of the unrealised profit made at first when selling to sub has been realised. Therefore both parent n sub can safely recognise the realised portion of the transaction n eliminate the unrealised profit made on the remaining yet unsold 1/3.

    Is that correct?

    November 8, 2012 at 6:23 am #106682
    mysteryCara1284
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    It’s getting clearer now, thanx!

    November 7, 2012 at 7:24 am #106680
    mysteryCara1284
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Since we don’t get to see the lecture for e.g 7, i don’t know if it was treated like e.g 8 & 9 but i’d assume so coz u do refer back to it in e.g 8.

    In the answer to e.g 8, there is no mention of the value of nci investment of $55,000 mentioned in e.g 7. Does it mean that if we’re told that ” Guido’s shares were worth $1.65 immediately before the acquisition by Ivona” , the value of nci investment given in eg.7 does not stand anymore or do we have to ignore nci investment of $55,000 given in eg.7 for the sake of e.g 8?

    Thank you.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)

Primary Sidebar

Kaplan ACCA Free Trial

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Ana1674 on CIMA BA1 Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient
  • tehreem21 on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data
  • vesuvianthree0 on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • amanization on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • Sid24012003 on Government grants – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in