Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- September 7, 2021 at 6:56 pm #634791
I understand the way you have shown in the lectures. The problem is as I do Bpp kit or past exams when they calculate the planning price variance by using the actual usage * (actual price – standard price) since they provide no infor about the revised usage. My question is if we have information about revised usage then when we calculate planning variance, we should use the revised usage instead of actual usage. Is that correct?
August 31, 2021 at 3:58 am #633581Thank you very much 🙂 I was so confused about that.
August 28, 2021 at 11:36 am #633240Thank you so much 🙂
August 27, 2021 at 9:15 am #633116Thank you so much. I did watch your free lectures but apparently I have forgotten this part since I watched it long times ago. I will watch the lectures again 🙂
August 23, 2021 at 9:36 am #632605Thank you so much for the answer. I have been confused about the value of capital employed that I should use. Now everything is clear. 🙂
August 21, 2021 at 5:03 am #632366Oh nvm I have realized that what I did was to calculate the total material variance and not material price particularly 🙂 Everything is fine now 🙂
August 12, 2021 at 6:54 pm #631378Thank you for the answer
July 30, 2021 at 10:30 am #629847Got it.
Thank you so much 🙂July 2, 2021 at 4:13 am #626818Thank you so much 🙂
March 3, 2021 at 10:46 am #612979Thank you for your answer
February 28, 2021 at 2:51 pm #612132Thank you.
February 23, 2021 at 10:14 pm #611479Hi,
And what about contingent assets? Do we include the contingent assets in subsidiary’s net assets for goodwill calculation?
ThanksFebruary 14, 2021 at 10:02 am #610344Oh nervermind I have misread the question.
Everything is fine.
ThanksFebruary 11, 2021 at 4:30 pm #610071I think that the transaction cost will be recorded in the value of the investment on 1/1/20X0. As on 31/12/20X0, the share price is 6$ per share so the value of investment on SOFP will be 240000$. The gain will go in OCI as I think the Financial asset is treated under FVOCI
February 9, 2021 at 9:46 am #609797Thank you very much for the answer. I have understood as the rise of COGS as the fair value is higher than cost and results in the reduction in RE
January 30, 2021 at 2:48 am #608527Thank you very much for the answer .
January 26, 2021 at 2:20 pm #608115Sorry for my typo regarding the initial impairment and I agree that it should be 3. My question is that after the first year, the recoverable amount is 7.5 so that means I can reverse part of the impairments and record the PPE at 7.5 is that right?
Thank you so muchJanuary 2, 2021 at 10:37 am #601303Thank you very much for your answer
- AuthorPosts