Forum Replies Created
- AuthorPosts
- December 5, 2014 at 11:40 am #217908
And what is the correect answer for 9 you think if not D?
December 5, 2014 at 11:23 am #217897@emo777 said:
You use penetration only to shortehn the initial life periodIn my situation 2 marks won’t make any weather. Hope I have passed this)
December 5, 2014 at 11:18 am #217888@emo777 said:
20 is obviously A, just checked the book20 – D ))) Can’t be true
December 4, 2014 at 10:08 pm #217728@riskyguy said:
If the price wont affect sales, how will it affect the market share?In my understanding – elasticity is applicable only for existing products. If you enter the market, even thoug the demand in not elastic – the price has significant impact on market share.
December 4, 2014 at 7:35 pm #217643You are right – increase in prices has no impact on sales. But – it s about entering the market – so there is impact on your market share when you state your prices.
December 4, 2014 at 7:19 pm #217622Riskyguy – it’s about lunching a new product. So it doesnt mean that we can “charge more without affecting sales”, We don’t know yet.
December 4, 2014 at 7:14 pm #217620Gvtftf
We enter market with low prices an gain a huge share. Than we increase our prices. As the demand is inelsatic – our huge share do not decrease. That is my logic.But if there was such question in BPP – than my logic is trash 🙂
December 4, 2014 at 6:54 pm #217606To Chris and the Gvttftf
Why did you put A on 20?
If the demand is enalastic, doesnt it mean that we can further increase price without our sales decreasin? Thus option 1 favours a penetration policy – so answer CDecember 3, 2014 at 7:13 pm #217054Have no idea about feed forward control and have already forgotten my answer (i suppose it was or feedforward, or negative feedback).
December 3, 2014 at 6:08 pm #217024Nu a che, v skole angliskii zrya ne proshel)
So no info about time of correct answers? Cause i’m gonna forget my answers soon)
D & A, 18k – i’m pretty uveren, chto eto pravil’noDecember 3, 2014 at 5:47 pm #217004Guys, i’m awfuly sorry, but who has any information about the right answers to the paper, as it is already uploaded at ACCA Global?
December 1, 2014 at 6:16 pm #215348Lower learning curve states, that the chairs will be produced faster – thus they will be cheaper
December 1, 2014 at 6:08 pm #215331It’s not the problem of mix, as it was even more expensive, thus qualiti didn’t become worth. Should search for sales volume decrease elsewhere
December 1, 2014 at 5:55 pm #215311But why we lose 40$?
We close A diviosion, and B division starts to buy at a price lower then from A divisionDecember 1, 2014 at 5:53 pm #215308To alicija
Got increase by 65k – 55 because of economy in purchase price and 10 on A division fixed costsDecember 1, 2014 at 5:31 pm #215279When choosing D and B – did you take in account, that there is small demand for B, and thus even to produce for all the demand – there will be available hours left?
December 1, 2014 at 5:28 pm #215274MCQ: 1. Only division A
Breakeven sales – above 18k units
Go on producing products A and D
Lifecycling costing – all components are included
Target costing – start with selling price, then estimate profit
Dont hire manager – expected -1300
Shadow price – increase on 16$December 1, 2014 at 3:12 pm #215180Sarah, it wasn’t so high. Perhaps about 20k
December 1, 2014 at 3:08 pm #215167?ave th same with mix and yield, as Sarah
December 1, 2014 at 3:06 pm #21516516 increase
- AuthorPosts