Forum Replies Created
- Posts
passed with 52 , second attempt . i did well in my view but the checking was sooo strict , paper was not tough but checking is most strict .
why are we not making adjustments to reach chargeable death state like subtracting mortage of 160000 by 374000 and funeral expenses and promise to repay son legal fees and all that why are you just putting in the death state value in the question of 950000 ? also for RNRB in question its never mentioned the property as main residence you are assuming that dont assume unless question specifically uses words MAIN residence or only residence . can you clear why other adjustments are discarded mentioned above in death state value ?
why in that illustration is miss calling nephew an remoter ancestor and charges 1000 when its 2500 for ancestors ? my dear Lord
fourth attempt pass 64 % , sir john moffat i will come back for you in f9 . he’s the best out there i did ask alot of questions and he replied everyone of them . great person but sometimes gets annoyed hahaahahah great person
environmental accounting question inflow/outflow question section a ? what were you getting i got 8500 . waste quatity X deposing cost per unit , am i correct ?
section A cvp question what was the number need to maintain the profit of 60000 . i got 1800 more units . am i correct anyone ?
in section C CVP , what was the guests number for yoga classes per year i got 8000 as it had 200 sits available per week and was open for 40 weeks a year and question said it was booked completey so 200*40=8000 . i think i messed up here
in marking scheme for yield it is AQSM = 2000 and SQSM = 1947 ?? this question is bpp page 326 question 5 . also how is he calculating 1947 for standard quatity at standard mix ?
if fixed costs are not sunk cost then whats the answer to the question ? there were no other options i remember in the paper ,there were only committed costs sunk costs and incremental. Sunk costs is the right answer ? because general fixed overhead is not incremental cause of the word general. there were no changes mentioned in Question just general fixed overhead and then three options beside it and it asked whats the correct matching.
sorry the question was
are general fixed overheads sunk cost , incremental costs or opportunity cost ?it can only be incremental when it is specific fixed overheads which in question i remember didn’t mention anywhere about specific . if its sunk cost then why so ?
yes sir , ohh great i never knew you had lectures on whole papers. Sorry the question was easy i was wrong . sorry sir wont happen again . sorry
sorry one more thing . in part a it asks for incremetal profit or loss upon accepting . this is what i did
we make profit before accepting 96-(70) variable plus T.P= 26 per component L
profit after accepting 96 – (67) variable costs of making M and the 37 from external buyer = 29
therefore division M make an incremental loss of 29-26 = 3 per component L upon buying internally
but in marking scheme its something to do with costs only n the answer is different