• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA FR:
  • FR Notes
  • FR Lectures
  • FR Practice Questions
  • Flashcards
  • Revision Lectures
  • FR Forums
  • Ask the Tutor
  • Ask AI (New!)

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Leases – sale and leaseback Example (not at fair value) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

VIVA

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. tint says

    September 9, 2024 at 11:23 pm

    why are your explanations so confusing couldn’t they be explained simply like how John does it

    Log in to Reply
  2. tules says

    August 30, 2023 at 5:12 pm

    Chris, the lease liability of £7,721,735 amortizes out to zero at the implicit interest rate of 5%, but when you add the additional million in the second example. Does the implicit interest rate change or is that additional million handled separately?

    Log in to Reply
    • tules says

      August 30, 2023 at 5:15 pm

      *when you add the additional million in the second example it does not.

      Log in to Reply
    • paddy.1234 says

      November 21, 2024 at 8:07 pm

      I know I am late but the 5% interest is actually applied on the fair value and not the amount we receive so if we received more then the fair value the extra 1m will be added to our liability when we amortise it

      Log in to Reply
  3. Daakiryare says

    October 18, 2022 at 7:46 am

    Thanks.

    but both seniors we use the old proceeds, that point i am not understood

    Log in to Reply
  4. Sybs says

    July 11, 2021 at 1:53 pm

    Thank you for the lecture, Chris.

    I have a question on the parts of this question that relate to ‘payments to be made at the end of the lease period’ and the ‘value of the total proceeds’ from the sale and leaseback.

    If $1mil. is to be made yearly in arrears for a period of 10 years, that amounts to $10mil. This is clear.

    However, if the lease period remains 10yrs and the proceeds are $9mil., shouldn’t the sum of the yearly arrears payment equal $9mil i.e., $9mil/10yrs = $0.9mill. or thereabouts annually. Same applies to when the proceeds were $11mil. in a 10yr period, $1mil. annually for 10yrs would be less than $11mil. that’s the sales proceeds. I think this would also affect our approach to solving this question. Please clarify. Many thanks.

    Log in to Reply
  5. salome.k says

    November 3, 2020 at 4:18 pm

    Dear Tutor

    From the previous example (sale and leaseback Example (at fair value)) you calculated – Right of use asset
    $6,486,257 = ($8400000 * 77.22%) and this 77.22% you got when you divided Liability/Proceeds ($10m).

    In this example, you rewrote – Right-of-use-asset exactly the same – 6,486,257, but we had different proceeds from Sale (Scenario1 – 9m)
    I also calculated by myself and got a different answer
    Right-of-use-asset = 7,206,953 85.80%(7,721,735/ 9,000,000) Liability/Proceeds

    Please explain why you calculated from $10m? When we have Proceeds of $9m

    Thank you!

    Log in to Reply
    • dmsu says

      March 20, 2021 at 8:04 pm

      I think it’s the requirement from IFRS that the seller/lessee measures the right of use of asset as a proportion of the CV based on the fair value (10m) and not from cash/proceeds received (9m or 11m)

      Log in to Reply
  6. haider10793 says

    October 21, 2020 at 9:38 am

    Dear Tutor / Other Members, whoever can clarify.

    When sold for $11m, higher than Fair Value, we consider it as additional financing. Therefore, Liability increases from 10 million to 11 million, and is recorded at Present Value. So, 11m over 10 years makes it 1.1m per year. For present value, we must now multiply this 1.1m with the Annuity Factor of 7.72 to get 8.49m. Why are we simply adding the additional 1m as it is to the 7.72m recorded while taking into consideration the 10m, whereas the 10m has effectively changed to 11m, and the additional 1m financing must also be discounted to PV??

    Log in to Reply
  7. santraantony says

    September 7, 2020 at 12:47 pm

    How is gain calculated?

    Log in to Reply
  8. olaosamn says

    June 25, 2020 at 2:44 pm

    Thanks chris for the excellent method of teaching,and for the comforting ,it is a loaded topic

    Appreciate it,:)

    Log in to Reply
  9. Billy says

    July 12, 2019 at 5:31 am

    In the case of sales of $11m:

    If we amortize $8.72m over 10 years at $1m payment p.a, at the end of 10 years, there is still lease liability of $1.63m, so is it correct? What should we do?

    Log in to Reply
  10. lynn5688 says

    February 26, 2019 at 12:51 am

    Hi Chris, I got question regard of the amount of the right of use asset.
    As I read through other resources. We must add the prepayment figure into right of use amount if the proceeds is below than the fair price. Which is 6,486,257 plus additional of 1M. ( a payment made /before the commencement date)

    Log in to Reply
  11. zhangcc says

    July 22, 2018 at 8:45 am

    Dear sir

    For the first scenario, proceed less than FV
    May I know the impact if I don’t know Dr prepayment but directly DR liability as the second scenario?
    Or I can actually do that by Dr the balancing figure in liabilities

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in