• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA FR:
  • FR Notes
  • FR Lectures
  • FR Practice Questions
  • Flashcards
  • Revision Lectures
  • FR Forums
  • Ask the Tutor
  • Ask AI (New!)

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

IAS 37 – provisions and contingent liabilities – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

VIVA

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. praveenmasih says

    February 20, 2022 at 4:27 pm

    What will be the Journal entry in example 1 please??

    Log in to Reply
  2. yhoi13 says

    August 19, 2019 at 9:05 pm

    Hi Chris,

    As the Conceptual Framework has been revised so does it affect IAS 37? Do we need to know somefing regarding FR exam in September 2019?

    Log in to Reply
  3. anamazingorange says

    August 19, 2019 at 5:47 pm

    In the first example, why are there duplicate answers? You tick Create a provision twice. Is that just an error or am I missing something? Thanks.

    Log in to Reply
  4. vijay says

    May 7, 2019 at 4:56 am

    Hi Cris,

    In the PPE dismantling cost treatment, you have shown PPE is debited and credited to provision.
    Now, why second entry called “unwiding” again credit provision? Isn’t this duplication?
    Also cost going two times to P&L, firstly through depreciation and secondly to financing cost?
    Can you please clarify?

    Log in to Reply
    • MikeLittle says

      May 7, 2019 at 7:08 am

      The amount involved in that original entry (Dr PPE and Cr Provision) is the PRESENT VALUE of the estimated future cost of dismantling the PPE

      Then, as each year goes by and we are one year closer to the dismantling date, that original present value of the estimated dismantling cost needs to be ‘unwound’ so that, all other things being equal, by the time the dismantling date is reached, there is the correct amount standing to the credit of the provision account

      And then the double entry will be Dr Provision Account Cr Cash with the amount paid out for dismantling

      Better?

      Log in to Reply
      • jatingupta@2097 says

        October 13, 2021 at 7:10 pm

        With which amount will the Provision be credited, is it the total amount of PV and unwound or is it just the unwound amount?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in