OpenTuition | ACCA | CIMA
Free ACCA and CIMA on line courses | Free ACCA, CIMA, FIA Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums
Spread the word
If you have benefited from our materials, please spread the word so more students can benefit.
To help us keep materials up to do and add new content you can also donate
July 5, 2020 at 6:17 am
Sir, thanks for the great lecture but I am confused in one bit. We haven’t discounted the revenue which we will be earning after a year. how have we come to this conclusion that we should continue with this project ?
John Moffat says
July 5, 2020 at 9:09 am
The very last line of this question specifically says to ignore the time value of money!
November 2, 2019 at 8:01 pm
The cost so far for the project was £150,000 and the cost of continuing is £174,000. So the total cost of the project would be £324000 and we are only going to gain £300000…surely it is a loss overall? Im confused
November 3, 2019 at 9:46 am
The 150,000 already spent is a sunk cost – it has been spent whether or not we decide to continue. So it is therefore irrelevant – we have lost the 150,000 whatever happens. We therefore just need to compare how much extra would need to be spent if we continue with the revenue we get from continuing.
November 10, 2019 at 1:45 pm
Thank you for your reply sir. I think I get it from theory point of view…your lecturers are always so helpful thank you
November 10, 2019 at 6:25 pm
Thank you for your comment 🙂
August 1, 2019 at 11:03 am
Thanks John for the explanation aspect of each class of expense. Indeed this area of DCF is closely related to relevant costing as in paper F5/FM. The key to questions of this nature is to identify what is relevant to the decision in question taking into account any opportunity cost/revenue.
April 27, 2019 at 3:57 am
I know we have to ignore the $150,000 already spent. But if we add that $150,000 and the additional $174,000 we would incur if we continue for 1 more year, it totals to $324,000 which is $24,000 more than the $300,000 we would earn. On that basis, shouldn’t we be discontinuing the project since it’s not going to be making a profit?
April 27, 2019 at 9:44 pm
Profits are not relevant – we are looking at the discounted cash flow method of appraisal.
The 150,000 has already been spent. If we nothing then the 150,000 is lost. If we continue then all that matters is whether the extra inflows are more than the extra outflows – if they are, then the loss is reduced and that is worthwhile.
April 28, 2019 at 4:56 am
That makes sense. Thank you!
February 24, 2019 at 2:25 pm
criss07: you are welcome 🙂
January 27, 2019 at 6:34 pm
Thank you sir. I love watching your lectures. They are always very well explained 🙂
November 22, 2018 at 10:27 am
Please why is wages and severance cost not in negative. Afterall it is a cost.
January 17, 2019 at 11:05 am
We are calculating the total additional cost to the company if the project in continued. So, we add all the costs.
November 12, 2018 at 7:37 pm
Hey! Couldn’t understand why the overhead absorption costs where ignored?
January 17, 2019 at 11:08 am
Because the overhead is not for the particular project. It is the overhead for the company as a whole and will incur even if the project is continued or not.
October 17, 2018 at 2:09 pm
Why you take 5000 as negative ?
October 17, 2018 at 2:54 pm
Because it is a cost. The question says that it costs 5,000 to dispose of the materials because they are toxic (poisonous).
February 24, 2019 at 1:19 pm
I am confused about this as well. The question says that if we don’t use the materials in the project (so if we don’t do the project) then the disposal cost is £5000. But we are calculating the cost to the company if the project is continued…therefore, aren’t we saving the £5000 disposal cost if the project is continued? Thank you
February 24, 2019 at 1:53 pm
I reviewed the video and now I understand. Thank you
You must be logged in to post a comment.