OpenTuition | ACCA | CIMA
Free ACCA and CIMA on line courses | Free ACCA, CIMA, FIA Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums
Spread the word
Please spread the word so more students can benefit from our study materials.
If you have found OpenTuition useful, please donate
February 20, 2021 at 10:09 pm
Sir.. I want to ask how can i get ready for april attempt… I dont know how to get prepare myself for Financial management paper..please help me out.. I m really nervous regarding thoery and all
John Moffat says
February 21, 2021 at 8:07 am
In future please pose this kind of question in the Ask the Tutor Forum and not as a comment on a test.
There is no exam session in April so I don’t know whether you are meaning March or June.
You need to study by watching all of our free lectures, and then you need to practice by buying a Revision Kit from one of the ACCA Approved Publishers and attempting every question in it.
February 13, 2021 at 1:31 pm
Sir, I have a doubt pertaining to the 4th question.
Why is the statement “A graph showing NPV on the Y axis and Interest rate on the X axis will have a negative slope,” not true? Please could you help me understand?
(I agree that the statement “Two NPVs are required to estimate IRR using linear interpolation,” is true. I was just wondering if there were two true statements).
February 14, 2021 at 8:37 am
There can be more than one IRR in which case the slope of the curve will be negative in some places and positive in others.
October 31, 2020 at 4:33 pm
Please in question 5, a 2yr AF was used instead of a 2yr DF. Why is that so please?
November 1, 2020 at 8:35 am
The flows are from time 3 to 9.
You can do it in either or two ways:
The 9 year annuity factor less the 2 year annuity factor will leave us with the total factor for 3 to 9.
Alternatively, you can take the 7 year annuity factor and then discount for 2 years because the annuity starts 2 years late.
Both approaches give the same answer (any small difference is simply due to rounding in the tables).
I do explain this in my free lectures.
December 4, 2020 at 10:37 am
I’m not sure why discount for 2 year instead of 3 year, sir?
E.g, the second one, why not discount for 3 years as the title saying that the amount from 3 year but 2 years?
December 4, 2020 at 1:55 pm
Multiplying by the 7 year annuity factor gives the PV ‘now’ for an annuity starting in 1 years time.
The annuity starts in 3 years time, which is 2 years later than 1 years time. Therefore the annuity factor gives the PV two years later – i.e. time 2 instead of time zero and therefore we need to discount it for 2 years to get the PV ‘now’.
October 1, 2020 at 6:13 pm
In question 1, why was the cash inflow added back.
October 2, 2020 at 9:12 am
Using a discount factor of 1/r for a perpetuity gives the PV when the first inflow is in 1 years time.
Here the first inflow is immediate i.e. at time 0, and the PV of $12,000 at time 0 is $12,000.
Therefore this needs adding to the PV of the perpetuity.
If you are still at all unsure then look back to the Paper MA (was F2) lectures on discounting, because this is revision of Paper MA.
October 2, 2020 at 11:48 am
Very clear,? since the inflow is at time 0.
Thank you sir, all good.
October 2, 2020 at 3:36 pm
You are welcome 🙂
August 20, 2020 at 4:00 pm
Sir, could you please explain why the IRR would not change even if there is change in the cost of capital. (referring- question 2)
I totally messed this question up!
Thanks in advance!
August 20, 2020 at 5:04 pm
By definition, the IRR is the rate of interest at which the NPV is zero.
The cost of capital is of no relevance in the calculation. It is only relevant if we are using an IRR approach to decide whether or not to invest – it the IRR is greater than the cost of capital the project is worthwhile. If the IRR is less than the cost of capital then the project should be rejected.
Did you watch my free lectures before attempting this test? If you did and are still not clear then watch also my free Paper MA (was F2) lectures on the IRR because this is revision from Paper MA.
August 21, 2020 at 3:03 am
Yes sir, I went back and watched the lectures again and understood the whole point.
Thank you 🙂
August 21, 2020 at 9:23 am
April 22, 2020 at 12:36 pm
100% score. Helpful questions. Thanks John
April 22, 2020 at 2:22 pm
February 6, 2020 at 8:11 am
In the example we find the difference between the upper and lower 5 and same for the NPv. why do add the 2 NPVs amount in this question?
February 6, 2020 at 9:42 am
The difference between + 0.343 and – 0.2659 is the sum of the two (or if you want to be mathematical (although this is not a maths exam) subtract a negative number is the same as adding the number).
I do suggest that you watch my free lectures on this and if necessary my Paper MA (was F2) lectures on discounting, because this is revision from Paper MA.
February 6, 2020 at 10:06 am
Thank you. Will go over the lecture for f2
January 8, 2020 at 8:30 pm
This might be a silly question, but when I was calculating the NPV in Question 3 for 20%, I accidentally got a positive net present value which ofcourse, messed up my IRR. Fixed that, no worries.
But would they ever ask us to use two discount rates which BOTH give a positive NPV to calculate the IRR? Or do you need the second discount rate to result in a negative NPV for IRR calculations…
November 24, 2019 at 3:41 am
October 27, 2019 at 8:01 pm
I have a question about the question n.5: I have tried to carry out the excercise using (for the 2 years) both the annuity for two years (1.736) and also calculating yearly with the annual discount (0.877and 0.756) but I arrive a two different results. In the first case with the annuity the amount is 83,328 (48,000 * 1.736), menawhile in the second case the amount is 83,280 (43,632+39,648). am I making a mistake? I was expecting the calculation to have the same result.
Thanks in advance.
October 28, 2019 at 7:12 am
The difference is due to the fact that the tables are rounded to 3 decimal places. It is irrelevant in the exam.
You must be logged in to post a comment.