OpenTuition | ACCA | CIMA
Free ACCA and CIMA on line courses | Free ACCA, CIMA, FIA Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums
Get yours with OpenTuition discount code >>
Sign up with YouTube premium to watch our lectures Ad-free and download them to watch offline.
Specially for OpenTuition students
March 21, 2020 at 8:59 pm
Thank you for the lectures.
John Moffat says
March 22, 2020 at 8:52 am
Thank you for your comment 🙂
February 17, 2019 at 5:17 pm
Dear sir. Question 1, why assuming that beta of debt is 0 will understate financial risk when ungearing an equity beta is false?
February 17, 2019 at 7:06 pm
Because using a beta of zero assumes that the debt has zero risk. In practice debt does carry some risk, therefore the beta of debt will be more than 1, and the fact that debt is risky in practice means there is more financial risk than when its beta is zero.
June 12, 2021 at 2:27 pm
Please explain question 1 3 statement , im confused
June 12, 2021 at 3:18 pm
If you look at the asset beta formula, the asset beta is the weighted average of the equity beta and the debt beta.
The asset beta is not affected by the gearing – if the gearing changes or the debt beta changes then it is the equity beta that changes.
We assume that the debt beta is 0 in calculations, but in practice it will be small but will be greater than zero. For the asset beta to remain unchanged (as it will) if the debt beta is greater than zero then the equity beta will be smaller. So assuming 0 will overstate the equity beta and overstate the financial risk.
Ainul Asyikin says
December 5, 2016 at 1:48 pm
Hello sir , does it mean that be in ke=rf+be(risk premium)
is business risk and financial risk that are not controllable since be only contain systematic risk?
Thanks in advance
December 5, 2016 at 3:36 pm
True, but all of this is explained in my free lectures on CAPM. Have you not watched them?
You must be logged in to post a comment.