• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA FM:
  • FM Notes
  • FM Lectures
  • FM Practice Questions
  • Flashcards
  • Revision Lectures
  • Revision Mock Exam
  • FM Forums
  • Ask the Tutor

Congratulations to Jamil from Pakistan and Jeeva from Malaysia - Global Prize winners!
see all ACCA December 2022 Genius Hunt Competition winners >>

Specially for OpenTuition students: 20% off BPP Books for ACCA & CIMA exams – Get your BPP Discount Code >>

FM Chapter 10 Questions – Investment appraisal under uncertainty

 

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. phuongmore says

    October 13, 2020 at 1:42 pm

    Dear sir, can sensitivity be negative?If yes, in which case?Thank you.

    Log in to Reply
    • phuongmore says

      October 16, 2020 at 1:23 am

      Dear sir please check my above question.Thank you

      Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      October 16, 2020 at 8:01 am

      Yes it can. Watch my lecture working through example 1 of Chapter 10 of the lecture notes.
      Did you not watch the lecture before attempting this test?

      Log in to Reply
      • phuongmore says

        October 16, 2020 at 4:49 pm

        I already watched but for a long time.I already watched again and I understand.Sorry but can I default understand that sensitivity of initial investment will always positive and sensitivity of sales column/contribution will always negative?If so, why in the Q3, sensitivity of sale column is 5.3%, not -5.3%?Thank you.

      • John Moffat says

        October 16, 2020 at 5:41 pm

        No, you cannot understand that. If a reduction in the variable is needed to result in a zero NPV then the sensitivity is negative. If an increase in the variable is needed to result in a zero MPV then the sensitivity is positive,

      • Acastanot says

        November 26, 2022 at 12:23 pm

        In the comment belo yos say „ If a reduction in the variable is needed to result in a zero NPV then the sensitivity is negative“. But in the third question, we state that sensitivity is +5.3% even though a reduction of the revenue/contribution is needed to result in a zero NPV. How come? Thanks a lot!

      • John Moffat says

        November 27, 2022 at 8:59 am

        The choice of answers do not specify whether positive or negative – they are testing just on the % amount.

  2. zakiijaz says

    March 15, 2020 at 12:01 pm

    Sir could you please tell me about the minimum acceptable contract price and how to calculate it

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      March 15, 2020 at 2:20 pm

      Which of the test questions are you referring to?

      Log in to Reply
  3. yula says

    November 27, 2019 at 1:28 pm

    in question, 2. is using the joint probability not valid

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 27, 2019 at 2:29 pm

      You could certainly use joint probabilities, but it would take a lot longer and the final answer would be the same.

      Log in to Reply
  4. asher2019 says

    November 24, 2019 at 5:47 am

    Thanks for the questions sir. I enjoyed solving them.

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      November 27, 2019 at 2:23 pm

      Thank you for your comment (but do make sure that you have a Revision Kit from one of the ACCA approved publishers because they contain lots more questions for practice) 🙂

      Log in to Reply
  5. gabbi08 says

    August 10, 2016 at 3:54 pm

    Dear Sir,

    Why question 1 statement 2 is not correct?
    The expected net present value is the value expected to occur if an investment project with several possible outcomes is undertaken once.

    Thanks

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      August 10, 2016 at 6:30 pm

      Not at all. The actual NPV depends on the actual returns.

      The expected NPV will only occur if the investment is undertaken lots of times – it is the average of all the possible NPV’s.

      Log in to Reply
      • gabbi08 says

        August 10, 2016 at 9:32 pm

        Dear Sir,

        True. I have misunderstood the question.
        Thanks a lot for your reply

        Gabriella

      • John Moffat says

        August 11, 2016 at 6:21 am

        You are welcome 🙂

  6. acca9 says

    June 23, 2016 at 11:08 am

    For Q 3 if the sales volume change, doesn’t the sales revenue pv change too?

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      June 23, 2016 at 5:11 pm

      Yes of course. But if the volume changes then the variable costs will change also.
      So it is the contribution that will change.

      (You really should watch my free lectures on this. Our lectures are a complete free course for Paper F9 and cover everything needed to be able to pass the exam well.)

      Log in to Reply
      • acca9 says

        June 23, 2016 at 9:06 pm

        I have watched the lecture….just got a little confused there. All clear now.
        Thanks for a bunch of great lectures-really clear!

      • John Moffat says

        June 24, 2016 at 7:41 am

        Thank you for the comment 🙂

  7. inarun says

    June 9, 2016 at 4:37 am

    Dear sir, correct me if im wrong, for question no 5, we should get -26%, if the NPV is negative, am I correct? Thank you, sir.

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      June 9, 2016 at 7:49 am

      The NPV will only fall if the initial investment is higher by 26%. So the sensitivity is + 26%

      Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2023 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in


We use cookies to show you relevant advertising, find out more: Privacy Policy · Cookie Policy