- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for December 2024 exams.
Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Sales and leaseback
Assuming that the transaction doesn’t constitute as a sale, how will the net effect result in reduction of financial gearing? This scenario is from bpp question 212
Hi,
If it does not constitute a sale then the asset is still recognised and we recognise a liability for the transfer proceeds, i.e. a loan. Based on this then I’d expect the debt to increase.
Thanks
I’m sorry, I meant to ask if it did constitute a sale*
If it does constitute a sale then we recognise a profit on the sale and remove the initial asset but replace it with a right-of-use asset measured at a carrying amount linked to the rights retained.
Thanks