- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by .
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- The topic ‘Dec 2011 Mackerel Contracting Q1 (ii)’ is closed to new replies.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA APM Exams › Dec 2011 Mackerel Contracting Q1 (ii)
Hey Sir,
In the question it stated that cost per unit no more than $70,000 for the invitation to tender from the government. In this case everything was below the $70,000.
Is it possible to get a question and the cost per unit is over the $70,000?
If the cost per unit is over the $70,000 how will that affect my answer to the question. Would I still process to calculate all the outcomes for the payout table or just the ones below the $70,000 or just mention which cost per unit is over?
Thanks
Personally, I don’t really understand why the $70,000 is there at all. That was relevant to the old rules but the Zedland government has agreed to pay 7.5m plus a 19% mark-up on variable costs, so I am not sure why they worry about the total costs to Mackerel.
Presumably if the total cost was over $70,000 then that combination of package and volume would simply not be an option and would not figure in the pay-off tables.
ok thanks