• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Dec 2011 Mackerel Contracting Q1 (ii)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA APM Exams › Dec 2011 Mackerel Contracting Q1 (ii)

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 5 years ago by rianna.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • February 14, 2021 at 11:13 pm #610426
    rianna
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Hey Sir,

    In the question it stated that cost per unit no more than $70,000 for the invitation to tender from the government. In this case everything was below the $70,000.

    Is it possible to get a question and the cost per unit is over the $70,000?
    If the cost per unit is over the $70,000 how will that affect my answer to the question. Would I still process to calculate all the outcomes for the payout table or just the ones below the $70,000 or just mention which cost per unit is over?

    Thanks

    February 15, 2021 at 7:26 am #610445
    Ken Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10651
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Personally, I don’t really understand why the $70,000 is there at all. That was relevant to the old rules but the Zedland government has agreed to pay 7.5m plus a 19% mark-up on variable costs, so I am not sure why they worry about the total costs to Mackerel.

    Presumably if the total cost was over $70,000 then that combination of package and volume would simply not be an option and would not figure in the pay-off tables.

    February 15, 2021 at 1:10 pm #610487
    rianna
    Member
    • Topics: 9
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    ok thanks

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • The topic ‘Dec 2011 Mackerel Contracting Q1 (ii)’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • billgates on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • billgates on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • sanayyaa on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 23 Inheritance Tax
  • sanayyaa on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 23 Inheritance Tax
  • Aadhi69 on Changes in group structure – step disposals – ACCA SBR lectures

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in