• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

302 Laurel Co

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › 302 Laurel Co

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by P2-D2.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 12, 2021 at 4:04 am #605562
    whateveritis
    Member
    • Topics: 11
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Dear tutors,

    I have a problem with this problem regarding this note:

    Laurel Co acquired 80% of the ordinary share capital of Hardy Co for $160million and 40% of the ordinary share capital of Comic Co for $70million on 1 January 20X7 when the retained earnings balances were $64million in Hardy Co and $24million in Comic Co. Laurel Co, Comic Co and Hardy Co are public limited companies.
    On 30 November 20X9 Laurel Co sold some goods to Hardy Co for cash for $32million. These goods had
    originally cost $22million and none had been sold by the year end. On the same date Laurel Co also sold goods to Comic Co for cash for $22million. These goods originally cost $10million and Comic Co had sold half by the year end.

    The BPP book solves the intra trading between Laurel and Comic as follows:

    Laurel Co’s sales to Comic Co (associate) ($22m – $10m) × ½ × 40% share = $2.4m.
    DR Retained earnings (Laurel Co) $2.4m
    CR Investment in associate $2.4m

    I do not think this makes sense because in this case, Parent makes a sale to the Associate so the profit on the sale should be derecognized in full value in RE of Laurel Co.

    Could you please help me to explain this?

    Thanks a lot.

    January 14, 2021 at 8:10 pm #605857
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7163
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    This is an associate PUP and so the adjustment made is for the parent’s share of the PUP. This parent’s share adjustment is made as it is reflecting the level of influence that we had over the profit being made. This is always done regardless of the direction of the sale.

    Thanks

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • julio99 on Impairments – Impairment (CGU) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on EPS – diluted EPS Example – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • DeborahProspect on ACCA SBR Specimen Exam 2 Question 1
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 9 Pension Schemes TX-UK FA2023

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in