• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

296 Highveldt Co page 96 BPP Kit

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › 296 Highveldt Co page 96 BPP Kit

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by P2-D2.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 6, 2021 at 2:28 am #601702
    whateveritis
    Member
    • Topics: 11
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Dear Tutors,

    I have some problems with this question regarding the following note:

    (iv) Samson Co’s development project was completed on 30 September 20X4 at a cost of $50 million. $10
    million of this had been amortised by 31 March 20X5. Development costs capitalised by Samson Co at the
    date of acquisition were $18 million. Highveldt Co’s directors are of the opinion that Samson Co’s
    development costs do not meet the criteria in IAS 38 Intangible Assets for recognition as an asset.

    In the Kit book, they calculate the Fair value adjustment in the FV of net assets at acquisition in the Goodwill as follows:

    Fair value adjustment:
    Revaluation of land 20
    Recognition of fair value of brands 40
    Derecognition of capitalised development expenditure (18)
    Total 42

    What I am not clear about is that the derecognition happens at the reporting date. Why do we have to include this in the Goodwill calculation at the acquisition date?

    I am looking forward to receiving your answers.

    Thank you.

    January 9, 2021 at 9:41 am #605328
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7171
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    The directors do not believe that the $18 million of costs do not meet the criteria, so this will not just have been the case at the reporting date but it would also apply at the acquisition date too. It states in the question that this is the case.

    Thanks

    January 12, 2021 at 4:31 am #605564
    whateveritis
    Member
    • Topics: 11
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    Thank you sir,

    That helps me to understand the problem better.

    January 14, 2021 at 8:10 pm #605858
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7171
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Excellent! Glad to hear it.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • RashidMh on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • John Moffat on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hsaini on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • kennedyavege@2023 on Relevant Cash Flows for DCF Relevant Costs (example 1) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in