• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

142 Prodigal (BPP book page 45)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › 142 Prodigal (BPP book page 45)

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by P2-D2.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 22, 2018 at 5:46 pm #492518
    yuska
    Member
    • Topics: 15
    • Replies: 11
    • ☆

    Hi
    My question is related to 142 Prodigal (BPP book page 45)
    1) (ii) Immediately after the acquisition of Sentinel on 1 October 20X0, Prodigal transferred an item of plant with a carrying amount of $4 million to Sentinel at an agreed value of $5 million. At this date the plant had a remaining life of two and half years. Prodigal had included the profit on this transfer as a reduction in its depreciation costs. All depreciation is charged to cost of sales.

    Revenue (450,00 + (240,000 × 6/12) – (W4) 40,000) = 530,000
    Cost of sales (260,000 + (110,000 × 6/12) + (W3) 800 – (W4) 40,000 + 3,000) = (278,800)

    QUESTION: Why the sale amount ( 5 million dollar) is not reduced from REVENUE?
    I think the sale amount must be deducted from revenue because of intra group trading and Cost Of Sales would have to be adjusted.

    Revenue (450,000 + (240,000 × 6/12) – (W4) 40,000 – 5,000) = 525,000
    Cost of sales (260,000 + (110,000 × 6/12) + (W3) 800 – (W4) 40,000 + 3,000 – 5,000) = (273,800)

    I am right or not?

    2) Other comprehensive income Prodigal Sentinel
    Gain on revaluation of land (note(i)) 2,500 1,000
    Loss on fair value of investment in equity instrument (700) (400)
    1,800 600
    (i) Prodigal’s policy is to revalue the group’s land to market value at the end of each accounting period. Prior to its acquisition, Sentinel’s land had been valued at historical cost. During the post-acquisition period Sentinel’s land had increased in value over its value at the date of acquisition by $1 million. Sentinel has recognised the revaluation within its own financial statements.

    Other comprehensive income:
    Gain on land revaluation (2,500 + 1,000) 3,500
    Investments in equity instruments (700 + (400 × 6/12)) (900)

    QUESTION: I wonder that why we take half loss (400 × 6/12 = 200) on fair value of Sentinel’s investment. It is maybe there is not any key stated that this loss occur post-acquisition period. If this is true, this means loss accrued evenly over the year. Then why we don’t take into consideration this half loss (200) when the goodwill is calculated

    Extract from calculation of the Goodwill on acquisition of Sentinel

    Fair value of net assets:
    Shares 160,000
    Other equity reserve 2,200
    Retained earnings (125,000 + (66,000 × 6/12)) 158,000
    (320,200)

    3) Is the following double entry true? Or not, Can you write right entry please?

    Unrealised profit = 1 mil
    Dr Retained earning of Prodigal ( cost of good) =1 mil
    Cr cost of asset in book of Sentinel = 1 mil

    Excess dep’ = (5-4)/2.5*6/12 =0.2 mil ( 6 month from acquisition to reporting day)
    DR Accumulated Dep’ of asset in book of Sentinel =0.2mil
    Cr retained earning of Prodigal ( group) =0.15 ( 75%)
    CR NCI = 0.05 ( 25%)

    December 24, 2018 at 9:54 pm #492640
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7156
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    1) The disposal of an item of PPE does not include any revenue adjustments in the transaction, there is just a profit or loss on disposal.

    2) Gains on revaluation take place at a point in time when the revaluation occurs and does therefore not need to be pro-rate, however the gain on an investment accrues over time and so will be pro-rated.

    3) The Cr to the asset has to be to inventory specifically. For the excess depreciation, this looks correct, as the excess depreciation being charged is reversed.

    Thanks

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • kadamova.f@gmail.com on Associates (IAS 28) – PUPs – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • kadamova.f@gmail.com on Associates (IAS 28) – PUPs – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • bpop on Risk and uncertainty (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • kamo7293 on Financial performance – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • nevertoolate on CIMA BA2 – Regression analysis

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in