Sorry for such a question, but it seems to me it’s more logical to make it 400 for SPL and 800 in SFP, because in SPL we show actual payments, whereas in SFP we show accruals.Hope it makes sense.
Its difficult to follow without any dates in the question but I’ll assume that the loan notes were issued at the start of the year and so we’ve recorded the full 12 months in the SPL. As only 400 of this appears to be paid then we need to accrue for the amounts not paid, being the difference between the total expense for the year of 800 and the amount paid of 400, thus giving the 400 accrual in the sFP.
The topic ‘Finance costs’ is closed to new replies.
Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy