Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › Kaplan Text Book Page 258-Coaster Co
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by P2-D2.
- AuthorPosts
- October 25, 2018 at 6:15 am #479721
Hi Sir,
The question asks us to identify whether the Financial instrument is equity or liability
1)1 million preference shares for $3 each. No dividends are payable.
Coasters will redeem the preference shares in three years’ time by
issuing ordinary shares worth $3 million. The exact number of
ordinary shares issuable will be based on their fair value on 30
September 20X6.The answer is the text book says its financial liability because ” contract that requires the entity to deliver as many of the entity’s own equity instruments as are equal in value to a certain amount should be treated as debt.
However in the 2nd part of question2)2 million preference shares for $2.80 each. No dividends are
payable. The preference shares will be redeemed in two years’ time
by issuing 3 million ordinary shares,But the answer says that “A contract that will be settled by the entity receiving (or delivering a fixed number of its own equity instruments in exchange for a fixed amount of
cash or another financial asset is an equity instrument”My question is how is that 1st one is treated as an liability and second as an equity when in both scenario coaster is “REDEEMING” the preferences shares by issuing its own equity instrument. In both cases i see that the company is obliged to deliver the equity instrument.
October 28, 2018 at 8:03 am #480013Hi,
The key difference is that in the first scenario the shares issued will be based on fair value and so a variable number will be issued, whilst in the second scenario the number of shares to be issued is already known and will not vary.
Thanks
October 28, 2018 at 10:47 am #480036Hi sir,
Thamk you for the reply.I did notice how the 1st one is based on fair value and the shares are not yet determined, and the second the number of shares to be issued is already known and will not vary. My question was how come the 1st one is treated as liability and second as equity. I dnt quite understand how the treatment of “based on fair value” make it liability and
second one ” number of shares to be issued is already know” make it as n equity?
Thanks in advance
October 30, 2018 at 9:07 pm #480277Hi,
The shares will have a fixed par value, and so as the fair value (share price) changes then we will issue a varying number of shares which is dependent on the final fair value at the date of issue of the shares. As there is no set amount of shares issued we cannot treat it as equity as we do not know how much a share of the net assets we will be giving on issue of the shares. Se we therefore have to treat it as a liability as it is a contractual obligation that is settled in its own equity instruments.
Thanks
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.