Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA LW Corporate and Business Law Forums › Paper F4 Dec 2010 exam was
- This topic has 126 replies, 72 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by choonfah87.
- AuthorPosts
- December 7, 2010 at 9:06 am #46712
Please share below with community your comments about F4 exam!
Vote in our instant poll!
[polldaddy poll=4204738]December 7, 2010 at 12:49 pm #73083AnonymousInactive- Topics: 10
- Replies: 60
- ☆☆
It was easy but a little lame… I mean 10 mark question about Statutory Documents?
And I’m going to lose marks in Question 9, about dividends… I didn’t cover that topic well, I think.Also, all the other important topics, insolvency, veil of corporation, etc could have been examined!
Anyways, It was good.
And yes… tutor’s guesses weren’t very good!
December 7, 2010 at 12:50 pm #73084AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
Whats the catch?? if i could have just picked the questions i wanted to be asked, i could not have done a better job!!!
December 7, 2010 at 12:51 pm #73085still hope for the best mate!!!
December 7, 2010 at 1:12 pm #73086AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 6
- ☆
Well. Think is was ok overall. Didn’t revise unfair dismissal but knew about remedy.
Just some little precisions:
Primary legislation = parliamentary legislation (or does that include case law as well?)
Question 8, Was it about promissory estoppel or intentions to create legal relations. Not sure.For the last question, didn;t understand anything. i do know some of the means of partnership disolution but the financial effect of it, nope.
Overall, i do believe it was a fair paper.
December 7, 2010 at 1:29 pm #73088AnonymousInactive- Topics: 10
- Replies: 60
- ☆☆
I personally liked 10th question; connected the ‘order of distributing the proceeds of assets’ with partnership dissolution.
My best question is going to be the 2nd one: about breach of contract.
Question 8 was about Intention to Create legal relations. I also discussed the acceptance by conduct and revocation.
December 7, 2010 at 1:31 pm #73089Best of Luck to all….
Paper was easy but i agree with shadedrose that how to get 10 marks in a short answer question.
I slipped at Q2.
December 7, 2010 at 1:56 pm #73090AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- ☆
Paper was ok..
I did not like the 3 last question though…:S
for question 8, was it on domestic agreement? whats your views on it guys?
hmm the tips were not accurate at all..!!LOL
December 7, 2010 at 1:56 pm #73091AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- ☆
Paper was ok..
I did not like the 3 last question though…:S
for question 8, was it on domestic agreement? whats your views on it guys?
hmm the tips were not accurate at all..!!LOL
December 7, 2010 at 1:59 pm #7309250% was absolutely unimportant….especially the tort broken down into sections.
Bonus and rights shares, i discussed them from accounting point of view (F7)
Statutory documents…huh….how come a 10-marker….
Amazed at David Kelly
But hope for the best as i did the contract, legislation, intentions to create legal relations, directors duties, dismissal….pretty good
Thanks
December 7, 2010 at 2:00 pm #73093Q8…i think it involved financial arrangements from a commercial sense….so there was a contract….Ben & Che have to pay
December 7, 2010 at 2:08 pm #73094AnonymousInactive- Topics: 10
- Replies: 60
- ☆☆
Right, Shunmas… I discussed bonus and rights from the general knowledge I had about them. What was the first part, though? pre- something rights?
December 7, 2010 at 2:12 pm #73095AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
will someone tell me what was question 8 related to?? i wrote about intentions and a bit of unilateral offer..wen i came out of the hall a friend told me they were askng about suffiency of consideration??? wat was it related to…
December 7, 2010 at 2:14 pm #73096AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 3
- ☆
shadedrose its was pre emptio right and its right of SH to b asked 1st wen issuing new shres tht is wen new shres r offered they shud b asked if they wnt 2 buy 1st..
December 7, 2010 at 2:21 pm #73097Attempted F4 Global ..
well it was definately okay , a bit unsure about two last scenarios , but in general i believe it’s gonna be a pass.
Was amazed about tips , specially those from EXP , i didn’t expect so many coincidences. However , relied on them, and it was a right choice 🙂December 7, 2010 at 2:27 pm #73098AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
what was principle of neighbor?
December 7, 2010 at 2:35 pm #73099AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
what vas de ans for tht 2 mark question in tort? economic liability
December 7, 2010 at 2:59 pm #73100AnonymousInactive- Topics: 3
- Replies: 3
- ☆
I THINK THE EXAMINER FORGET THE FORMAT OF THE PAPER…
December 7, 2010 at 3:10 pm #73101hi
does anyone know how strict they are?I have attempted all questions, well but not perfect…
now realised that misunderstand the subject with arbitration panel..fisrt time i attended the exam i got 3 points and i dod not know almost anything :)…now i have learned and mistaken…ufffff
December 7, 2010 at 3:20 pm #73102AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 22
- ☆
December 7, 2010 at 3:48 pm #73104How many chances there are to pass while attempting 8 of 10 ..main principles and ideas…?
December 7, 2010 at 4:42 pm #73105AnonymousInactive- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
F4 Global.
I studied a lot for this papaer and cannot overcome the disappointment for the questions that they expected for us to answer for 10 marks.
My materials for the study were from Kaplan, for some questions the study books presents two paragraphs. Now David Kelly expects us to take each and every topic and turn it upside down by our own?
At some stage during the exam, it felt like someone is mocking my hard work, by expecting me to write for 10 point about bonus issue and pre-emption rights.
It is unfair. There were so many questions that were important for F4 and were not tested in this session.December 7, 2010 at 4:57 pm #73106I comepltely misunderstood question 2, I thought it was to do with tort (dont ask, I feel embarrased even mentioning it!), but the rest of the exam was fair I think.
December 7, 2010 at 5:17 pm #73107I was totally unprepared for the question on dissolution of the partnership and distributing the assets, how was it done?
Also the dividends were illegal yes? Because the profit this year was below the dividend payout therefore the remainder had to come from the revaluation reserve?
I wasn’t happy with my attempt. Wrote one line for the accounts produced and maintained section. 🙁
December 7, 2010 at 5:29 pm #73108I think I mucked up accounting records too – read too much into the question. I said need to produce annual accounts, statements of capital, tax returns and VAT returns… but I think the answer should be more simple than that!
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.