• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Paper F4 Dec 2010 exam was

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA LW Corporate and Business Law Forums › Paper F4 Dec 2010 exam was

  • This topic has 126 replies, 72 voices, and was last updated 15 years ago by Avatarchoonfah87.
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 127 total)
1 2 … 6 →
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 7, 2010 at 9:06 am #46712
    Avataradmin
    Member
    • Topics: 249
    • Replies: 723
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Please share below with community your comments about F4 exam!

    Take our F4 exam survey >>

    Vote in our instant poll!
    [polldaddy poll=4204738]

    December 7, 2010 at 12:49 pm #73083
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 59
    • ☆☆

    It was easy but a little lame… I mean 10 mark question about Statutory Documents?
    And I’m going to lose marks in Question 9, about dividends… I didn’t cover that topic well, I think.

    Also, all the other important topics, insolvency, veil of corporation, etc could have been examined!

    Anyways, It was good.

    And yes… tutor’s guesses weren’t very good!

    December 7, 2010 at 12:50 pm #73084
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Whats the catch?? if i could have just picked the questions i wanted to be asked, i could not have done a better job!!!

    December 7, 2010 at 12:51 pm #73085
    AvatarMoiz
    Member
    • Topics: 2
    • Replies: 14
    • ☆

    still hope for the best mate!!!

    December 7, 2010 at 1:12 pm #73086
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 6
    • ☆

    Well. Think is was ok overall. Didn’t revise unfair dismissal but knew about remedy.

    Just some little precisions:

    Primary legislation = parliamentary legislation (or does that include case law as well?)
    Question 8, Was it about promissory estoppel or intentions to create legal relations. Not sure.

    For the last question, didn;t understand anything. i do know some of the means of partnership disolution but the financial effect of it, nope.

    Overall, i do believe it was a fair paper.

    December 7, 2010 at 1:29 pm #73088
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 59
    • ☆☆

    I personally liked 10th question; connected the ‘order of distributing the proceeds of assets’ with partnership dissolution.

    My best question is going to be the 2nd one: about breach of contract.

    Question 8 was about Intention to Create legal relations. I also discussed the acceptance by conduct and revocation.

    December 7, 2010 at 1:31 pm #73089
    Avatarali.hbc@gmail.com
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 34
    • ☆

    Best of Luck to all….

    Paper was easy but i agree with shadedrose that how to get 10 marks in a short answer question.

    I slipped at Q2.

    December 7, 2010 at 1:56 pm #73090
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Paper was ok..

    I did not like the 3 last question though…:S

    for question 8, was it on domestic agreement? whats your views on it guys?

    hmm the tips were not accurate at all..!!LOL

    December 7, 2010 at 1:56 pm #73091
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    Paper was ok..

    I did not like the 3 last question though…:S

    for question 8, was it on domestic agreement? whats your views on it guys?

    hmm the tips were not accurate at all..!!LOL

    December 7, 2010 at 1:59 pm #73092
    AvatarShunmas
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 86
    • ☆☆

    50% was absolutely unimportant….especially the tort broken down into sections.

    Bonus and rights shares, i discussed them from accounting point of view (F7)

    Statutory documents…huh….how come a 10-marker….

    Amazed at David Kelly

    But hope for the best as i did the contract, legislation, intentions to create legal relations, directors duties, dismissal….pretty good

    Thanks

    December 7, 2010 at 2:00 pm #73093
    AvatarShunmas
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 86
    • ☆☆

    Q8…i think it involved financial arrangements from a commercial sense….so there was a contract….Ben & Che have to pay

    December 7, 2010 at 2:08 pm #73094
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 59
    • ☆☆

    Right, Shunmas… I discussed bonus and rights from the general knowledge I had about them. What was the first part, though? pre- something rights?

    December 7, 2010 at 2:12 pm #73095
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    will someone tell me what was question 8 related to?? i wrote about intentions and a bit of unilateral offer..wen i came out of the hall a friend told me they were askng about suffiency of consideration??? wat was it related to…

    December 7, 2010 at 2:14 pm #73096
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    shadedrose its was pre emptio right and its right of SH to b asked 1st wen issuing new shres tht is wen new shres r offered they shud b asked if they wnt 2 buy 1st..

    December 7, 2010 at 2:21 pm #73097
    Avataransi
    Participant
    • Topics: 119
    • Replies: 757
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Attempted F4 Global ..

    well it was definately okay , a bit unsure about two last scenarios , but in general i believe it’s gonna be a pass.
    Was amazed about tips , specially those from EXP , i didn’t expect so many coincidences. However , relied on them, and it was a right choice 🙂

    December 7, 2010 at 2:27 pm #73098
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    what was principle of neighbor?

    December 7, 2010 at 2:35 pm #73099
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    what vas de ans for tht 2 mark question in tort? economic liability

    December 7, 2010 at 2:59 pm #73100
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    I THINK THE EXAMINER FORGET THE FORMAT OF THE PAPER…

    December 7, 2010 at 3:10 pm #73101
    Avatardianaa
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    hi
    does anyone know how strict they are?

    I have attempted all questions, well but not perfect…
    now realised that misunderstand the subject with arbitration panel..

    fisrt time i attended the exam i got 3 points and i dod not know almost anything :)…now i have learned and mistaken…ufffff

    December 7, 2010 at 3:20 pm #73102
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 22
    • ☆

    @saaag said:
    what was principle of neighbor?

    I think we had to mainly refer to Stevenson’s case and also talk a little about neibour by proximity…

    December 7, 2010 at 3:48 pm #73104
    Avatardianaa
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    How many chances there are to pass while attempting 8 of 10 ..main principles and ideas…?

    December 7, 2010 at 4:42 pm #73105
    AvatarAnonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    F4 Global.

    I studied a lot for this papaer and cannot overcome the disappointment for the questions that they expected for us to answer for 10 marks.

    My materials for the study were from Kaplan, for some questions the study books presents two paragraphs. Now David Kelly expects us to take each and every topic and turn it upside down by our own?
    At some stage during the exam, it felt like someone is mocking my hard work, by expecting me to write for 10 point about bonus issue and pre-emption rights.
    It is unfair. There were so many questions that were important for F4 and were not tested in this session.

    December 7, 2010 at 4:57 pm #73106
    Avatarfbawany
    Member
    • Topics: 20
    • Replies: 155
    • ☆☆

    I comepltely misunderstood question 2, I thought it was to do with tort (dont ask, I feel embarrased even mentioning it!), but the rest of the exam was fair I think.

    December 7, 2010 at 5:17 pm #73107
    Avataraam2009
    Member
    • Topics: 8
    • Replies: 37
    • ☆

    I was totally unprepared for the question on dissolution of the partnership and distributing the assets, how was it done?

    Also the dividends were illegal yes? Because the profit this year was below the dividend payout therefore the remainder had to come from the revaluation reserve?

    I wasn’t happy with my attempt. Wrote one line for the accounts produced and maintained section. 🙁

    December 7, 2010 at 5:29 pm #73108
    Avatarkateyliz
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 5
    • ☆

    I think I mucked up accounting records too – read too much into the question. I said need to produce annual accounts, statements of capital, tax returns and VAT returns… but I think the answer should be more simple than that!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 25 posts - 1 through 25 (of 127 total)
1 2 … 6 →
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Gyette on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AllisonHoang on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data
  • zuluthanda1@gmail.com on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in

Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy
Settings Accept all
Cookies
Choose what kind of cookies to accept. Your choice will be saved for one year. Read our cookie policy
  • Necessary
    These cookies are not optional. They are needed for the website to function.
  • Statistics
    In order for us to improve the website's functionality and structure, based on how the website is used.
  • Experience
    In order for our website to perform as well as possible during your visit. If you refuse these cookies, some functionality will disappear from the website.
  • Marketing
    By sharing your interests and behavior as you visit our site, you increase the chance of seeing personalized content and offers.
Save Accept all