• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Tax withheld on return of investment.

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › Tax withheld on return of investment.

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by P2-D2.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 1, 2018 at 3:01 pm #439555
    kamranhyder
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 0
    • ☆

    So I am auditing a Company based in Malta. That Company has bought 8% of shares in X company based in Netherlands and also paid share premium. X company returns this share premium to the Maltese Company but this return of investment is subject to withholding tax by Dutch authority which is final tax and cannot be recovered. This is the accounting treatment done by the Company:

    Year 1:
    Dr. Investment 1,000,000 (100,000 share capital and 900,000 share premium)
    Cr. Cash 1,000,000.

    In the following year X company (which is now very profitable) returned some of the share premium to the Company and expects to return more in coming years. But Dutch authorities withhold 10% tax on all outbound payments. This is the accounting treatment done by the Company:

    Year 2:
    Dr. Cash 180,000
    Dr. Administrative exp 20,000
    Cr. Investment 200,000

    The management of the Company charged it in administrative expense because this tax is not a tax on income but it is a transaction cost, hence an administrative expense.

    Someone suggested that in year one the Company should have recorded a deferred tax liability and charged an expense in PnL of 90,000. And in following years they should reduce the liability every time they receive the payments.

    While I think that the Company should have impaired the investment in year one by 90,000 since the carrying amount of 1,000,000 is higher than it’s recoverable amount of 910,000.

    Really confused regarding this, what should be the correct treatment of this?

    March 4, 2018 at 8:25 pm #440196
    P2-D2
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 7172
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Hi,

    I cannot provide information on something like this. If I give you incorrect information then I may be liable, sorry.

    Thanks

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • RitikaR29 on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Krishadarwin on Strategy : real life examples – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mabdullah31 on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • MikeLittle on Illegalities – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • roksy on Illegalities – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in