It is just a quirk of the rules in that it is treated under IAS 16 and not IAS 8.
The reasoning behind it is that if you do change to the revaluation method under IAS 16 then you do not need to restate the comparatives, but if it was done per IAS 8 then you would.
Thanks
Author
Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy