• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Why the Intra-group transfer of plant is not qualified as a intra-group trade?

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Why the Intra-group transfer of plant is not qualified as a intra-group trade?

  • This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 12, 2016 at 1:49 pm #309877
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 43
    • Replies: 124
    • ☆☆

    Hi Mr Mike Little,

    This is specifically relating to Q 1 June 2011 exam.

    Prodigal transferred a plant to the subsidiary Sentinel immediately after the acquisition. The transfer price is 5 million at cost of 4 million. So why don’t we adjust the group revenue and cost of sales by both 5 million? But only with the unrealised profit on the transfer, ie 1 million, as well as the difference of depreciation?

    Thank you.

    April 12, 2016 at 3:47 pm #309899
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 43
    • Replies: 124
    • ☆☆

    Hi Sir,

    I looked up the text book when I got home and found out the related instructions on intra-group asset transfer procedures. So I’m understanding my original question now. But what I do not understand is why the depreciation adjustment falls on the intra-group asset transferring is not taken to the calculation of post acquisition profits of Sentinel.

    My working was increase the profit of Sentinel by 1000 (5 million value / 2.5 years of depreciation * 6/12 post acquisition period); and decrease the profit of Prodigal by 800 (4 million value / 2.5 years of depreciation * 6/12 post acquisition period).

    Why the answer provided by the Examiner is only to adjust the difference of depreciation by increase the profit on the Prodigal?

    Thank you!

    April 13, 2016 at 1:18 am #309946
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 43
    • Replies: 124
    • ☆☆

    Hi Sir,

    Could you help me understand my question two? Thank you.

    April 13, 2016 at 7:43 am #309974
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23303
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I’ve already typed out a complete answer to this! Where’s it gone?

    Until relatively recently it was accepted that we eliminate the profit on the transfer from the selling company and we adjust for the excess depreciation charge in the records of the buying company

    But then it changed.

    The thinking now is that, when an asset is transferred, a profit is accounted for, but it’s an unrealised profit. That profit becomes realised by the passage of time so, as each year goes by, an appropriate proportion of that profit is realised. And that realised proportion is equal to the excess depreciation that is charged by the buying company

    So nowadays we make the FULL net adjustment in the records of the selling company

    OK?

    April 13, 2016 at 12:36 pm #310001
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 43
    • Replies: 124
    • ☆☆

    So you mean if the transferring is done from subsidiary to the parent, the unrealised profit (aka the excessive depreciation) is adjusted on the profits of the subsidiary?

    Thank you.

    April 13, 2016 at 3:26 pm #310011
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23303
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “the unrealised profit (aka the excessive depreciation)” – not sure what you mean by this but the pup ie the profit on the transfer as adjusted for the excess depreciation is adjusted in the selling company – in your question, the subsidiary

    April 13, 2016 at 5:30 pm #310038
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 43
    • Replies: 124
    • ☆☆

    OK, got it now. Thanks.

    April 13, 2016 at 5:52 pm #310041
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23303
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hhys on PM Chapter 4 Questions Environmental Management Accounting
  • singhjyoti on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • John Moffat on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in