• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

DEC 2009 Q1

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › DEC 2009 Q1

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 12, 2015 at 4:37 pm #241021
    sky1407
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    Hi sir why is there a tax benefit for license fee?

    April 12, 2015 at 4:58 pm #241026
    sky1407
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    PART A question says based on financing cashflows only means only consider the outflow?what about the savings from operating cost?

    April 12, 2015 at 5:04 pm #241028
    sky1407
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    PART B why not take into account the ;license fee?im confused with part a n b

    April 13, 2015 at 6:52 am #241067
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54664
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The license fee is an expense, it will reduce the taxable profit as do all expenses, and therefore it will save tax.

    The savings from operating cost will be made whichever way the project is financed and therefore it is irrelevant to the decision as to whether they lease or buy (which is why the question specifically says to consider the financing costs only – i.e. those flows that will be different depending how it is financed)

    Part b does take into account the licence fee – it is included in the calculation of the 974,762 (the PV of buying. It was not included separately when calculating leasing in part a because the lease payment included the license fee).

    April 14, 2015 at 5:22 pm #241294
    sky1407
    Member
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 8
    • ☆

    part a if i calculate the asset cost of 1 million without bracket sign and tax benefit with bracket sign my answer would be different. is this wrong?

    April 14, 2015 at 5:35 pm #241296
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54664
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – it would be wrong!

    Paying for the asset is an outflow and is therefore a negative cash flow and should therefore be bracketed.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Dileena on Sources of finance – Islamic Finance – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • amaanalli on Governance – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • nabeelafatima on Using Information Systems – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • John Moffat on Irrecoverable Debts and Allowances Example 3 – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • Fangzi on The cost of capital (part 1) – ACCA (AFM) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in