Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › XTOL June 2014 Note 1
- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- November 16, 2016 at 8:42 pm #349371
Dear Mike,
I really need your help once again… Thanks in advance
I don t have a clue how below note has been answer and the logic. Could you kindly explain it to me?
Revenue includes an amount of $20M for cash sales made through Xtl’s retail outlets during the year on behalf of Francais. Xtol, acting as agent, is entitled to a commission of 10% of the selling price of these goods. By 31 March 2004, Xtol had remitted to Francais $15M (of the $20M sales) and recorded this amount in cost of sale.
Answer provided.
Should have done:
Dr Cash 20,000
Cr Other Income 2.000
Cr Trade Payable 18,000Dr Trade Payable 15.000
Cr Cash 15,000Did
Dr Cash 20.000
Cr Revenue 20.000
Dr Cost of sale 15.000
Cr Cash 15.000Correction
DR Revenue 20.000
Cr Cost of sale 15.000
Cr Other income 2.000
CR trade Payable 3.000Is the agent included in the syllabus for exam December 2016?
Could you please explain the accounting treatment?
Why did we credit Payable?Thanks and Regards
Gabbi
November 16, 2016 at 8:52 pm #349375“Is the agent included in the syllabus for exam December 2016?”
This has nothing to do with accounting for agents!
This is simply an entity recording as a sale a transaction that is just a commission transaction and only commission income should be recognised
“Why did we credit Payable?”
If you were to write down the debits and credits that had been posted and then write next to them the entries that should have been posted, you will see that there needs to be a $3,000 credit balance within the Trade Payables account
The entries listed out above may be clearer if you were to write them down side by side:
Have done ……… Should have done
And then you may be able better to see the entries necessary to get from the incorrect position to the correct position
Let me know how you get on
November 16, 2016 at 9:18 pm #349380Dear Mike,
Many thanks for your prompt response, but I still don t get the entries.
Let me be a bit more precise in my question.
Why did we credit 18.000 in Trade Payable?Probably if I get this point I might be able to work out the rest
Dr Cash 20,000
Cr Other Income 2.000
Cr Trade Payable 18,000Thanks again for your help.
GabbiNovember 17, 2016 at 4:29 am #349437“Revenue includes an amount of $20M for cash sales made through Xtl’s retail outlets during the year on behalf of Francais. Xtol, acting as agent, is entitled to a commission of 10% of the selling price of these goods. By 31 March 2004, Xtol had remitted to Francais $15M (of the $20M sales) and recorded this amount in cost of sale.”
What the entity HAS done (wrongly) is treated the transaction as a purchase and a sale, bought for $15,000 and sold for $20,000
That’s this bit:
Dr Cash 20,000
Cr Revenue 20,000
Dr Cost of sale 15,000
Cr Cash 15,000But that’s not correct because the goods were never purchased and the revenue doesn’t belong to the entity – we’re only selling the goods to earn a commission
So try this as an alternative approach – reverse these entries and get back to a clean slate by the following (in your workings)
Dr Revenue 20,000
Cr Cash 20,000
Dr Cash 15,000
Cr Cost of sale 15,000Now that leaves us in the position where NO entries have been made to record this transaction
So we are in the position to put through the correct figures
We have received cash of $20,000, we have earned commission of $2,000 and we owe the principal $18,000 that needs to be paid over
So let’s reflect this by putting through some proper entries:
Dr Cash 20,000
Cr Commission Income 2,000
Cr Payables 18,000Now, we’re told that we have already paid 15,000 of that 18,000 so reflect that payment
Dr Payables 15,000
Cr Cash 15,000Is that any better for you?
November 17, 2016 at 12:56 pm #349569It is perfect now.
Thanks a million for your amazing explanations.
Best Regards
Gabbi
November 17, 2016 at 1:22 pm #349575You’re welcome
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.