Hello. I'm a confused with working capital financing policies. For example, a moderate policy implies that all of the non-current and permanent current assets should be financed by long-terms sources. But I think it also implies liquidity ratios to be abnormally high.
Say a company have $10 m of PPE, $5 of permanent current assets and $1 m of fluctuating current assets. Those current assets are financed by shareholders' funds of $12, $3 m of long-term loan and $1 m of payables. Thus, all of the non-current assets and permanent current assets are covered by long-term finance. But the current liquidity ratio is 6 ((5+1)/1). Could you explain me this, please. It seems contradictory to me now.
Ask the Tutor ACCA FM
Working capital financing policies
But there is no contradiction :-)
The more conservative the policy is then the greater will be the current ratio and therefore there is less risk (which is the advantage of a conservative policy).
The more aggressive the policy, then the lower will be the current ratio and therefore there is more risk.
The 'downside' of a more conservative policy is that there will be more interest payable (because you are borrowing money that is not always needed) whereas a more aggressive policy will mean paying less interest because you are only borrowing money when it is needed.
Have you watched my free lectures on this? The lectures are a complete free course for Paper F9 and cover everything needed to be able to pass the exam well.
Thank you for the reply.
I think a current ratio of 6 is too high, isn't it?
If the current ratio of the company is 1.2, than 83% of the current assets are financed by short-term sources. It seems to be an aggressive financing poilicy. But it is the benchmark the current ratio to be not less than 1 (if inventories are not slow-moving).
6 is certainly rather high, but there is no standard current ratio (apart from it being more than 1, otherwise there are major liquidity problems) - it very much depends on the type of business and you could only really state that it seems too high (or low) by comparing with similar businesses.
Topic lockedNew replies are closed.
