• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

WORKING CAPITAL DICOUNT OFFER CONFUSION

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › WORKING CAPITAL DICOUNT OFFER CONFUSION

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 6, 2019 at 11:37 am #515067
    josephee
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    There have benn the same type of question on june 2011 and december 2013 based on the working capital for accepting or rejecting discounts offered by suppliers, the exam solutions for june 2011 does not consider discount in computation of trade payables while the later considers discount, which approach was corre

    Thursday 9 June 2011 – trade payables after discount does not consider discount

    Annual demand is 120,000 components. The current terms are payment in full within 90 days, which ZPS Co meets, and the cost per component is $7·50—-The supplier has offered either a discount of 0·5% for payment in full within 30 days—-Assume that there are 365 days in the year and that ZPS Co can borrow short-term at 4·5% per year

    Early settlement discount
    Annual cost of components = 120,000 x 7·50 = $900,000 per year
    Value of discount offered = 900,000 x 0·005 = $4,500

    Current level of payables = 900,000 x 90/365 = $221,918
    Revised level of payables = 900,000 x 30/365 = $73,973
    Reduction in payables = 221,918 – 73,973 = $147,945
    Increase in financing cost by taking discount = 147,945 x 0·045 = $6,657

    Net value of offer of discount $4500 – $6657 = -$2,157

    Friday 6 December 2013 – trade payables after discount considers discount

    The annual demand for Product Q is 456,000 units per year and Plot Co buys in this product at $1 per unit on 60 days credit. The supplier has offered an early settlement discount of 1% for settlement of invoices within 30 days—-Plot Co finances working capital with short-term finance costing 5% per year. Assume that there are 365 days in each year.

    Product Q trade payables at end of year = 456,000 x 1 x 60/365 = $74,959
    Product Q trade payables after discount = 456,000 x 1 x 0·99 x 30/365 = $37,105
    Decrease in Product Q trade payables = 74,959 – 37,105 = $37,854
    Increase in financing cost = 37,854 x 0·05 = $1,893
    Value of discount = 456,000 x 0·01 = $4,560
    Net value of offer of discount = 4,560 – 1,893 = $2,667

    May 6, 2019 at 2:01 pm #515090
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Please do not give links to pirate websites – it is illegal and the ACCA gets angry because the exams are copyright of the ACCA. For that reason I have deleted the link.

    As I state in my free lectures, there are arguments both ways as regards the discount and the examiner always accepts either answer (and the difference is only ever small).

    May 6, 2019 at 6:20 pm #515120
    josephee
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 3
    • ☆

    @johnmoffat said:
    Please do not give links to pirate websites – it is illegal and the ACCA gets angry because the exams are copyright of the ACCA. For that reason I have deleted the link.

    As I state in my free lectures, there are arguments both ways as regards the discount and the examiner always accepts either answer (and the difference is only ever small).

    I appologize for posting links and wont happen again.

    So which of the two options is practically feasible?

    Should the computation for trade payables include the amount of credit purchases after discount or take credit purchases before discount

    May 7, 2019 at 2:25 pm #515222
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I don’t know what you mean by ‘practically feasible’. Offering s discount is obviously feasible and that is the only practical aspect.

    As far as the arithmetic is concerned, it is debatable – that is why the examiner always allows either approach.

    (and the difference will only ever be relatively small. In practice the difference will be irrelevant to the decision 🙂 )

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hhys on PM Chapter 4 Questions Environmental Management Accounting
  • singhjyoti on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • John Moffat on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in