• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Working capital 3 receivable and payable

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › Working capital 3 receivable and payable

  • This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by AvatarJohn Moffat.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 4, 2016 at 11:31 am #324669
    AvatarSaimon
    Participant
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 55
    • ☆☆

    Sir in example 2 why did you use overdraft % on reduction of receivable….i don’t see logic behind it

    and again i don’t see how receivable have reduced, because

    in your lecture in 63 days i can collect on average 3452055
    and in 54 days i can collect (3452055*54/63)=2958904.286
    and in 365 day i am collecting (2958904.286*365/54)=20,000,000
    (3452055*365/63)=20,000,000
    so where did you have adjusted for the discount that i am going to offer and what is point of doing separate working for new customer if i don’t adjust for the discount????

    July 4, 2016 at 11:33 am #324670
    AvatarSaimon
    Participant
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 55
    • ☆☆

    actually main problem is i am collecting 20,000,000 p.a from receivable with and without discount…

    i think 3452055 in 63 days is equivalent to 2958904 in 54 days

    July 4, 2016 at 11:51 am #324671
    AvatarSaimon
    Participant
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 55
    • ☆☆

    shouldn’t the working for new customer be like this

    20,000,000-120,000=19,880,000

    19,880,000*54/365=2,941,150

    reduction on receivable=(3,452,055-2,941,150)=510,905

    July 4, 2016 at 4:25 pm #324687
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Participant
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54839
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I do mention this in my lecture.

    There are arguments for and against subtracting the discount when calculating the new average receivables, and the examiner is not consistent in his answers.
    However the difference that results in only ever small and you would get full marks whether or not you subtracted the discount.

    July 4, 2016 at 5:40 pm #324692
    AvatarSaimon
    Participant
    • Topics: 123
    • Replies: 55
    • ☆☆

    which means my way of calculation is also correct…i can workout in the way i have shown above

    July 5, 2016 at 9:19 am #324717
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Participant
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54839
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes, certainly 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • accasaqibbayazeed@gmail.com on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • siyandasikelelambali on CIMA E2 Chapter 2 Test
  • mgfhmg on PPE – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on Introduction to Financial Accounting – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • John Moffat on Activity Based Costing part 1 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in