- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 2 years ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- The topic ‘White Knight strategy’ is closed to new replies.
Interactive BPP books for September 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › White Knight strategy
The text goes as ” This tactic is acceptable provided that any info given to preferred bidder is also given to hostile bidder”….I mean why??
Is it because maybe the hostile bid is in the best interests of shareholders but hostile bid would result in the management losing their jobs and so they want to be acquired by a company where their power would still be there??
One more thing,
After a reverse takeover, what happens to the shares of the “private company”? I know the private company’s shareholders exchange their shares for shares in public company but what happens then to those private company’s shares?
Thanks a lot
First point: It is because it would be illegal to give info were given just to one party and not all parties.
Second point: The private company then closes down and the shares are cancelled.
Thanks a lot sir
You are welcome.
