• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

When to use which netting method?

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › When to use which netting method?

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 7, 2014 at 5:55 pm #167813
    sameed
    Member
    • Topics: 40
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Hi John, first of all thanks a lot for your continuous support.

    I want to ask about foreign exchange hedging methods regarding netting and matching. In a question from June 10 exams MULTIDROP, they have first converted it to a common currency where there where different group subsidiaries and outside companies were involved.

    And another question MJY June ’05 they have not converted all the transactions to a common currency in a similar scenario, instead they have ignored the transactions in £ (which is home currency) and then determined the net exposure in foreign currencies (€ & $).

    Why the different methods are used in eqch of these question?

    May 8, 2014 at 7:35 am #167858
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54702
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    There are no rules about this – it is up to the individual company/group how they want to do their netting.

    In Multidrop, the question specifically said that the had agreed that all settlements would be in Euros (the principal was Multidrop (Europe)), and so everything was converted to Euros.

    In MJY, it was a UK based company with foreign subsidiaries. It did not specify in what currency to do the netting, but since it was UK based and all of the exchange rates given were against the £, it rather forced you to assume that the netting would all be done after converting to £’s.

    May 8, 2014 at 10:14 pm #167986
    sameed
    Member
    • Topics: 40
    • Replies: 97
    • ☆☆

    Ok thanks,

    May 9, 2014 at 5:06 am #167996
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54702
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • verweijlisa on Financial performance – Example 2 – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • John Moffat on Linear Programming – Spare capacity and Shadow prices – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • John Moffat on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part d)
  • Salexy on Linear Programming – Spare capacity and Shadow prices – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • omerbasheer on The Statement of Financial Position and Income Statement (part d)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in