• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Washi Co, Sep 2018, Q17, Currency Options – Premium

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Washi Co, Sep 2018, Q17, Currency Options – Premium

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 1 day ago by AvatarJohn Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 10, 2026 at 10:48 am #731004
    Avatarnaveez
    Participant
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 13
    • ☆

    Hello

    I would like to clarify the treatment of the currency option premium in this question.

    Washi Co is due to receive EUR 80m in six months, so it needs protection against a fall in the EUR/JPY rate. Therefore, the correct option hedge is to buy EUR put options, giving Washi the right to sell EUR at the exercise price of JPY 126 per EUR.

    The examiner’s answer calculates the option hedge as follows:

    EUR 80m *126 = JPY 10,080m

    Premium: EUR 80m* 3.8% = JPY 304m

    Net receipt: JPY 10,080m – JPY 304m = JPY 9,776m

    So the examiner deducts only the premium amount.

    My approach was slightly different. Since the option premium is paid now, but the EUR receipt is received in six months, I assumed that the premium should be accumulated to six months using the Japanese treasury bill yield of 1.2% per annum.

    Therefore:

    JPY 304m * (1 + 1.2% * 6/12) = JPY 305.824m

    Then:
    JPY 10,080m – JPY 305.824m = JPY 9,774.176m

    My rationale was that if we are comparing all hedge outcomes at the six-month date, the premium paid today has an opportunity cost because Washi could otherwise have invested that amount in Japanese treasury bills.

    Would this approach be acceptable if I clearly state the assumption that the option premium is accumulated to the six-month settlement date?

    Thank you, looking forward for your advice!

    May 11, 2026 at 7:29 am #731010
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54843
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – that would certainly be acceptable 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • TEDI on IAS 16 Property, plant and equipment – Initial Recognition – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • ChanNV on Framework – measurement – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • ChanNV on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Konstantinos43 on Financial Performance Measurement – Liquidity Measures – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Hirak.5 on ACCA TX-UK FA2025 Chapter 3 Property Income and Investments – Individuals

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in