Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FM Financial Management Forums › ( WACC ) Miller & Modigliani
- This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 13 years ago by sophia moore.
- AuthorPosts
- May 17, 2011 at 12:28 pm #48455
Hoping there is someone out there who can explain the assumptions of M & M theory with tax etcin a simple enough way as to which a 5 year old could understand it lol, I Just cannot seem to get it around my head arhhh please can somebody help me?
May 19, 2011 at 11:06 am #81784Hi Sophia,
I’ll have a go…
First you have to look at the traditional view.
There is an optimum level of cost of capital – the amount of debt and equity that the company has.MM say that this is rubbish. The structure of the company is irrelevant.
The low cost debt is exactly offset by the higher yield on equity.Their second theory – with taxes – says that as debt finance is tax deductible it acts as a tax shield.
The company should therefore borrow to 100% gearing.Hope that helps and that I’m right.
Spencer.
May 19, 2011 at 1:27 pm #81785Traditional view:
they say that as the loan capital increases in total capital structure of company, as debt is cheaper, the wacc (average rate from the combination of rates of debts and equity) will come down. which is understandable because debt is cheap so rate would be cheap. but shareholders r clever after certain level of debt, they would want to increase their return as company might face liquidation due to high gearing.M and M no tax: according to this theory they say that change as debt financing increases, shareholders will react to it quickly and wil increase their return demand. so on the one hand debt fianncing making wacc low, on the other hand returns for equity demand r rising. so wacc remains unchanged.
M and M with tax: in real life there r tax implications. so they revised their theory. this goes like debt is net of tax. i.e. tax deductible. so the interest u pay on tax will help u to pay less tax. now what happens is, debt will look even more cheaper because of its tax benefit.. so basically the more debt in ur capital structure investors i.e. the equity holders will increase their demand for return as the debt level increases but the proportion of increase of gearing. but tht INCREMENT wont be as much as the benefit from debt being tax decutible. so in theory its better if co is 99% debt financed.
but we know that can lead to liquidity hence not advisable.
HOPE IT MAKES SENSE 🙂May 20, 2011 at 12:56 pm #81786Thankyou for replies its finally starting to make a bit more sense : )
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.